From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4FF73CB35 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:22:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:22:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1610738542; bh=CPv3T5yOv0GGHME9XB4VeiCOTpBlwPiYVDZ79W3bgcc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=v5v2WtoMTnybLchl416XsTidTmUPx8RXzuLdHwDsgXsx870Mky/a97JFnwdeAjbfj XERDg2jThAFBUcJOsh1AGBcDfVKzN/14jv5RBRZ4y5AwKMW2VdVR55SImJy4g+ya6w +OeeEYWPXhkzHaCrvId78G4SVCMRsOJGYmSmJ7cU= To: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= From: Michael Yartys Cc: "make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net" Reply-To: Michael Yartys Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8735z2rpwr.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87a6tarwy3.fsf@toke.dk> <8735z2rpwr.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Weird periodic latency X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:22:23 -0000 On Friday, January 15th, 2021 at 19:55, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Michael Yartys michael.yartys@protonmail.com writes: > > > I assume that I got it right by running: > > > > flent --test-parameter ping_hosts=3D1.1.1.1 -l 300 netperf-eu.bufferblo= at.net tcp_8down > > > > Either way, I think I'll have to do this test at another time since > > > > someone is streaming TV downstairs (via Ethernet!) and it really > > > > pollutes the results: https://imgur.com/a/F33LjeA > > > > For what it's worth, the ping to 1.1.1.1 looks the same. > > The extra ping flow is not shown by default on the plot with the regular > > ping (for that test), so you'll have to use '-p ping_extra' to see it... Thanks for the tip! I use the GUI so I just selected ping_extra under the p= lot selector to confirm that they looked similar. > > -Toke