From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9CF63CB8F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:21:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id u14NLO1n026299; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:21:24 -0800 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:21:24 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: John Yates cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/Plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Google's OnHub? X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:21:28 -0000 This was discussed a bit back when this product was first announced. I don't remember the details, but I recall that the response was that they weren't pushing for open drivers/firmware to the level that we believe is needed to be able to address issues. I agree it's a very interesting bit if kit. but without the ability to go in and change the drivers, we're pretty stuck David Lang On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, John Yates wrote: > If we could enlist them in the make-wifi-fast effort mightn't they have the > clout to get us access to the innards of a product that they are sponsoring? > /john >