From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (lang.hm [66.167.227.134])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7958A3B260;
 Mon,  2 May 2016 15:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
 by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id u42Jl66o005638;
 Mon, 2 May 2016 12:47:06 -0700
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: Roman Yeryomin <leroi.lists@gmail.com>
cc: dpreed@reed.com, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net,
 Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
 "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
 ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACiydb+nNEWfO8XS63MnrW0LazORAGX+L+fF1xZ2_2sCLeRAsg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605021246080.28791@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <CAA93jw6QLyx9EaS+ntB0D3duoysu_Z-UYyQfHnRa=pfqPDfWOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <57258F41.8040600@candelatech.com>
 <CAA93jw46O3CbURxyP7AENkOCnA71Bn6ddTJpdfzEjWcFKgnaAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1462114043.512818296@apps.rackspace.com>
 <CACiydb+nNEWfO8XS63MnrW0LazORAGX+L+fF1xZ2_2sCLeRAsg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood
X-BeenThere: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <make-wifi-fast.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast>
List-Post: <mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast>,
 <mailto:make-wifi-fast-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 19:47:22 -0000

On Mon, 2 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote:

> On 1 May 2016 at 17:47,  <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
>> Maybe I missed something, but why is it important to optimize for a UDP flood?
>
> We don't need to optimize it to UDP but UDP is used e.g. by torrents
> to achieve higher throughput and used a lot in general.
> And, again, in this case TCP is broken too (750Mbps down to 550), so
> it's not like Dave is saying that UDP test is broken, fq_codel is just
> too hungry for CPU

while I wouldn't do it via wifi, syslog to/from relay systems can result in a 
lot of UDP traffic that could look like a flood.

David Lang