>“A possible L4S end game?”

 

Doubtful; latency is just emerging as a new competitive factor – like throughput. I also think – if we care about reducing latency – we should embrace whatever works well and achieves scale (Betamax vs VHS).  😉

 

From: Nnagain <nnagain-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 04:39
To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Frank Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] The Verge: The quiet plan to make the internet feel faster

 

Top story on HN:

 

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38597744

 

My pick for top comment:

 

 

 

A possible L4S end game? 😁 




All the best,

Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik@gmail.com

 

 

On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 7:22 PM, Robert McMahon via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

Sorry, this isn't a very good technical analysis. It's a push agenda for AQM. I get that many people's egos are tied to their belief that my algorithm came down from God himself. It's not true though.

Bob

On Dec 10, 2023, at 3:12 AM, Sauli Kiviranta via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

I find it alarming for the future of internet that there is a trend to
use elbowing techniques to squeeze metrics out at the expense of all
other flows. We know that when nobody plays fair the arms race ends
badly.

Best regards,
Sauli

On 12/10/23, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
 Well, to be completely honest, I would say its about general public, really
- it’s an article in The Verge :-)

But yeah. Here’s something they should address:

https://github.com/heistp/l4s-tests#key-findings

In general - a potential harm to innocent bystanders is a biggest L4S
problem:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/frantisekborsik_jonathanmorton-l4s-ietf118-activity-7128317873571176448-GWAX




All the best,

Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik@gmail.com


On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 5:48 AM, Matt Mathis via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
 About L4S

https://www.theverge.com/23655762/l4s-internet-apple-comcast-latency-speed-bandwidth

It says something about their target audience that they feel they need to
explain bytes vs bits.

Thanks,
--MM--
Evil is defined by mortals who think they know "The Truth" and use force
to apply it to others.


Matt Mathis  (Email is best)
Home & mobile: 412-654-7529 please leave a message if you must call.


Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
 


Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain

_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain