Re: [NNagain] pet peeves and policy recommendations

[Robert McMahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2473 bytes --]

There are large NRE spends and advancements in WiFi around spectral efficiency, multilink operatons, ofdma and RUs, wider channels, lower latency, ap/sta densities, obss concurency, etc.

The 802.11be standard is a good reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11be

WiFi hasn't been abandoned like DSL, ATM, tokenring, etc. I think 802.11 will survive and have continuous improvements per this mass investment by industry players.

Bob

On Oct 9, 2023, 1:45 PM, at 1:45 PM, Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>I scribbled down a few things that I wish had more champions.
>
>1) The US government holds 10? 11? IPv4/8s. At the current market
>prices for these that is over 700m per range. To cross the digital
>divide new users and ISPs need IP addresses, the government itself
>update more to rfc1918 and/or ipv6, and selling these off seems like a
>way to fund other internet related projects.
>
>2) Obviously I care deeply about more QoE technologies being deployed.
>It makes an enormous difference in internet quality especially at low
>bandwidths. I have been pilloried for suggesting too often that 25/10
>with CAKE was actually all most american families need.
>
>3) The CTO of the whitehouse position remains unfilled since the start
>of the Biden administration. Perhaps with more clue at the top, and
>office space for it that is not in the basement floor, with a sign
>saying "Beware of the leopard", smarter policies will emerge.
>
>4) I wish the world could focus less on bandwidth in general, more on
>wifi and low latency at range, and less interference (e.g. smaller
>default channel widths) and jitter
>
>5) I really love the uIXP idea. IT has become very cheap to build a
>SDN router capable of bgp and 100Gbit throughput. Every town could
>have one or more open network interconnects, not just between the
>biggest providers but also enabling newer technologies to emerge.
>
>6) There is no 6!
>
>7) Similarly, Biden''s electrification program (every 50 miles, a
>charger) is a good place for a uIXP. Similarly, the postal service has
>a lot of space everywhere mostly standing idle.
>
> 8) IPv6, anyone?
>
>--
>Oct 30:
>https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
>Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
>_______________________________________________
>Nnagain mailing list
>Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2719 bytes --]