From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77ADE3B29D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 17:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (104-182-38-69.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.182.38.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 3BGMvqUr001658 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:57:52 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sonic.net; s=net23; t=1702767473; bh=OxrohmfRSjVr2JyAz7ZbNnm8Hp+raYCZevmGqSzb+iA=; h=To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject; b=s56CGc58TiqyTaxCD65C7tP2OYUS4kbhV29/DDrNOAIw6lKJVzPxtDpFKQmgYD837 gk5cP4vJnjsrWKFtvw+BLN2DcVDIaM7eWwPIl/pY0pVrnDBQZpZkq8kdw5yObguXUm LVNDOroCpF7TLIdZWxBzcCc3yip+oK8q3VyQImX3mTJMRBhq+DYRIhQ9xlo2N1m8Ra ewK7J+rXYl46bBpeRpyFzbMN9dV6vgW++wR6W4K7HnFWOUacogluOiJ6GCxKgyW9q6 ebeU7aoI3w3qV8ZmpW/1ej1VlK0nBUDee2JTbJRNm4BfgMzEDawph8z6H2Y6PeFJyX wTMrYQzdVeinQ== Received: from hgm (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352EC28C1C3; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:57:52 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.8 To: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Hal Murray Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:57:52 -0800 Message-Id: <20231216225752.352EC28C1C3@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVYScx0eTs8O9EaDiQDdeVmWWbvvS5JgPV7j3L7PhkVFnrYr7Gdgpv7mtWgj2VYAR1EAk9/BYkZiRRVGVJ9s+PdWUJCWvLRDkuo= X-Sonic-ID: C;rtK6imac7hGQ8hVnR+6Zsg== M;uJHOimac7hGQ8hVnR+6Zsg== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -1.5/5.0 by cerberusd Subject: [NNagain] Starlink X-BeenThere: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?= List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 22:57:54 -0000 Frantisek Borsik said: > The only way to deliver it to them in a reasonable timeframe is Starlink. What sort of bandwidth/latency do I get from Starlink if I'm the only user in a large area? The spectrum is shared. Does the bandwidth per user go down as more users in the antenna footprint become active? How many users per square mile/km can Starlink support at the current target bandwidth? ... What fraction of the country is rural enough that it won't get fiber? How much of that is sparse enough so that Starlink will work? What should I be asking? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.