From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp78.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (smtp78.iad3b.emailsrvr.com [146.20.161.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56AAA3CB37 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 04:10:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Auth-ID: karl@auerbach.com Received: by smtp18.relay.iad3b.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: karl-AT-auerbach.com) with ESMTPSA id 9E9A4E00CD for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 04:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3ce603ed-5459-4d7b-af24-f377dcb384b4@cavebear.com> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 01:10:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: karl@cavebear.com Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspe?= =?UTF-8?Q?cts_heard_this_time!?= Cc: Nnagain References: <6D7F7242-248B-4FD4-BEDA-EE931B7DFE3C@andyring.com> <0a158308-e0c1-4722-8013-745e3ded232d@app.fastmail.com> <1B7534EB-2FCE-4500-B53D-F1DFEED1DBC7@gmx.de> From: Karl Auerbach Organization: IWL In-Reply-To: <1B7534EB-2FCE-4500-B53D-F1DFEED1DBC7@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Classification-ID: 886a7ec3-bb0e-43a2-b296-ebc8b60dd9ef-1-1 Subject: Re: [NNagain] On "Throttling" behaviors X-BeenThere: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?= List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 08:10:53 -0000 Extremely minor comment: I see the phrase "access to the Internet" being used.  That rubs me the wrong way because nearly everything we do on the net is "access *across* the Internet".  The difference may seem subtle; but to me it is important because the former phrase tends to make me overlook that from a user point of view, what matters is the full-path, the full end-to-end experience.         --karl--