From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass header.d=ifi.uio.no header.i=@ifi.uio.no header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key2309 header.b=cj9jnxq7; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used Org Domain Record) header.from=ifi.uio.no policy.dmarc=none Received: from mail-out04.uio.no (mail-out04.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::76]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35F5197D8AA; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:34:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ifi.uio.no; s=key2309; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xY0n6hCv3VtKiCBHMuk8tWDauHZ2F67447+mihnXovQ=; b=cj9jnxq792J6rk8SyzCXr0H1PB voCA0bZFjJ2Wk+VXw5Q3jC0zgdXcmrZCFQ4yOLcUA4iaHJpdOc9RgRtxI4u1+SxRlsvs/0V9L9RQa MwTWPe8c/ttvNZpB3foCesM8lk3Pd9TO80vj1mNq0s/sdVKilWSvp/iyue+JM0LSDfrjRyQtNZk22 PYR9WeuimOlkoMJS36YCqC9bkS8fbt8saUnamy1wjFGydZqbccfLmw1QjkHd+x5vNv3Tel0unK06C htg8Ji3EY3glHG4yZeGOSdj6WWZpksssdzEYZ2h/5OU/w1rmZrbd8cOkVvaHJcnzX/Jqs33ST7PkL euOi2OTA==; Received: from mail-mx25.uio.no ([2001:700:100:8210::6]) by mail-out04.uio.no with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xNqIi-00000002sZT-3rrU; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:34:08 +0100 Received: from collaborix.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.136.194] helo=smtpclient.apple) by mail-mx25.uio.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:secp256r1) (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xNqIi-0000000GkIr-2mQ1; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:34:08 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.700.51.1.4\)) From: Michael Welzl In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 12:33:57 +0100 Cc: Frantisek Borsik , =?utf-8?Q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C4=ABs_make_the_technical_as?= =?utf-8?Q?pects_heard_this_time!?= , Dave Taht via Starlink , bloat , Cake List , libreqos , Jeremy Austin via Rpm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <55A6E0F9-EFC6-47B0-93C8-FBE76BD93DEC@ifi.uio.no> References: <409d88430a154642b1183accedfa97709d51d1e1586146c3a922af0a185d72f4@OS5P279MB0502.NORP279.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> To: Sebastian Moeller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.700.51.1.4) X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx25.uio.no: 129.240.136.194 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=129.240.136.194; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=smtpclient.apple; X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.7, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=0.300,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001,UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5) X-UiO-Scanned: D7AE094FE2A16380554EEB32A3D2665AC40AC62C X-MailFrom: michawe@ifi.uio.no X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation Message-ID-Hash: Y2KYHBFCS3N4MSQ44QYMSICT5YQESOYR X-Message-ID-Hash: Y2KYHBFCS3N4MSQ44QYMSICT5YQESOYR X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 14:42:39 +0100 X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?= Subject: [NNagain] Re: [Bloat] The French have decided to destroy the Internet within their own country by taxing Gigabits (Dr. Peering) List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: OMG, it seems I did something terrible. My apologies to everyone who got = strange emails from me this morning. This: >> On Nov 2, 2026, at 08:44, Michael Welzl wrote: >>=20 >> The tax is 5 cents per Gigabyte. This is insane. is a lie that was made up by Outlook. The email was written by someone = else; auto-forward from Outlook had failed; =E2=80=9Capply the filters = again after the failure=E2=80=9D has been removed from the Outlook = interface; I found a =E2=80=9Csend again=E2=80=9D function which, I = thought, sends it again **TO ME** =E2=80=A6 not to the original = recipients **on my behalf** ! I didn=E2=80=99t write the original message and didn=E2=80=99t even plan = to get involved in this discussion - because: > P.S.: My take this is half-baked and will not make it through the = further legislative process in that form. =E2=80=A6 I think so too. I=E2=80=99m very, very sorry for any email noise from me today :-( Cheers, Michael