Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert McMahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: Fearghas Mckay <fearghas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bill Woodcock via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:30:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <730e404c-f7ef-4845-a634-71fb0505e3c8@rjmcmahon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2FE6AC99-172D-4948-8277-AD4316054E3D@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --]

For education and modeling. Students used to run on campus radio stations as an example. A modern world requires understanding things like IXPs.

The original statement is a bit facetious. The so called data center building for $305M is really not such. It's about a landmark building to serve as a focal point to sell the university. Kinda like a church spire or something. Humans seem fascinated by such types of buildings. I think what's taught and what isn't is a better focus.

Bob

On Feb 24, 2024, 4:05 AM, at 4:05 AM, Fearghas Mckay <fearghas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 Feb 2024, at 18:58, rjmcmahon via Nnagain
><nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> Boston University spent $305M on this and it doesn't have an IXP.
>
>There are two well established distinct IX in the metro already - why
>would you need a third that is not at an interconnection site ?
>
>Boston IX
>Mass IX
>
>	f
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2358 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-24 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 22:54 Brent Legg
2024-02-22  8:14 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 13:39 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-22 18:58   ` rjmcmahon
2024-02-22 23:31     ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23  0:03       ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23  0:04         ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23  0:09           ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23  0:51             ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23  1:47               ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-24 12:05     ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 12:27       ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 13:12         ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 13:24           ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 14:03             ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 21:30               ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 19:30       ` Robert McMahon [this message]
2024-02-25  6:04         ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 20:15   ` [NNagain] Email and The Internet? Jack Haverty
2024-02-23  0:02   ` [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project Bill Woodcock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=730e404c-f7ef-4845-a634-71fb0505e3c8@rjmcmahon.com \
    --to=rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com \
    --cc=fearghas@gmail.com \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox