From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Brent Legg <blegg@connectednation.org>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:14:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7AF2FB10-1442-4B11-920E-57504CD57423@pch.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF400A9C-6751-473C-B4B2-36EEF1D9EADB@connectednation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --]
> On Feb 21, 2024, at 23:54, Brent Legg via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> I think there is confusion in the terminology being used. When we say “IXP,” we mean the facility (building, venue) where interconnection & peering occurs.
Yes, if that’s your intent, you’re being very confusing.
Perhaps it would be less confusing if you called the IXP and IXP, and called the “facility (building, venue)” say, a “building” or “facility” or, if appropriate, a “datacenter.”
-Bill
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 22:54 Brent Legg
2024-02-22 8:14 ` Bill Woodcock [this message]
2024-02-22 13:39 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-22 18:58 ` rjmcmahon
2024-02-22 23:31 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23 0:03 ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23 0:04 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23 0:09 ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23 0:51 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23 1:47 ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-24 12:05 ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 12:27 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 13:12 ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 13:24 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 14:03 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 21:30 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 19:30 ` Robert McMahon
2024-02-25 6:04 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 20:15 ` [NNagain] Email and The Internet? Jack Haverty
2024-02-23 0:02 ` [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project Bill Woodcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7AF2FB10-1442-4B11-920E-57504CD57423@pch.net \
--to=woody@pch.net \
--cc=blegg@connectednation.org \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox