From: Sascha Meinrath <sascha@thexlab.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] broadband measurement summit in DC March 7th
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:50:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9531f4a7-e077-643e-c371-a31a054d03de@thexlab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw681y5pVpXLFPPBBqdtsYDF4Bn12y3zuFP4kdQE5WdUOA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
Never got it unbricked, alas, but we did finish up the RadarToolkit.com
firmware, and are currently winding our way through getting permissions to open
source that software stack (the federal agency has given the o.k., and now we
just need the lead NGO to get sign-off from its board). Radar is a fairly
extensible Pi-based (and mobile-app-based) measurement tool that enables
longitudinal data collection to document network reliability. We've already
deployed hundreds of these devices across 4 states, and have documented
real-time "rolling blackouts" on specific ISPs up in Alaska. Radar is also
fairly seamless in terms of collecting info needed to make BEAD challenges
(which is this month's hot issue) -- though I'm far more interested in
collecting baseline intel prior to BEAD interventions (so that we can document
meaningful impact).
I remain quite perplexed on how NTIA plans to actually document the efficacy of
their public investments. One of the biggest (rightful) critiques of the BTOP
program was that there was no empirically-based assessment of what worked, and
what didn't. 12 years later and NTIA appears hell-bent on making exactly the
same mistake.
Meanwhile, I'll be very keen to see how the Broadband Nutrition Label rollout
goes -- starting next month, we *should* be able to do the first-ever,
systematic comparative pricing analyses on a national scale (at least among the
large-scale providers).
--Sascha
On 3/1/24 08:34, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 8:32 AM Sascha Meinrath <sascha@thexlab.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'll be there!
>
> Did you ever get your wndr3800s to work? I could send you a box of a
> few 25 dollar fq_codeled gl.inet boxes to anyone that needs ´em,
> particularly those still stuck with DSL. I have also been encouraging
> folk to run the waveform or speedtest.net tests on the conference
> wifi....
>>
>> --Sascha
>>
>> On 3/1/24 07:29, Dave Taht via Nnagain wrote:
>>> Anyone going to this?
>>>
>>> https://broadbandbreakfast.com/broadband-measurement-summit/
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-01 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 12:29 Dave Taht
2024-03-01 13:32 ` Sascha Meinrath
2024-03-01 13:34 ` Dave Taht
2024-03-01 13:50 ` Sascha Meinrath [this message]
2024-03-01 14:35 ` Dave Taht
2024-03-03 12:54 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9531f4a7-e077-643e-c371-a31a054d03de@thexlab.org \
--to=sascha@thexlab.org \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox