Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Livingood, Jason" <jason_livingood@comcast.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] nn back in the news
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 13:27:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9F54B8F8-3B2B-4F45-A197-E6137A74F492@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5ihXaW+923b008shjifyENmmL_RYd9LfQp03t-Fm_bQQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1366 bytes --]

I would say it is not “back” in the news – it has continuously been in the news since the Loper Bright SCOTUS ruling that impacts “Chevron deference” as well the major questions doctrine issue raised in W VA vs EPA. As many people have long said, this will be tied up in the courts for several years.

Personal take – in the long-term it will be better to have legislation that codifies this (as well as a national cross-sector privacy law).

JL

From: Nnagain <nnagain-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date: Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 07:41
To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: [NNagain] nn back in the news


https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/isps-ask-supreme-court-to-kill-new-york-law-that-requires-15-broadband-plans/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/isps-ask-supreme-court-to-kill-new-york-law-that-requires-15-broadband-plans/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!FPiUKVoVIIjDuEAjFeVX-ISnAeSb8gI7-H-8Pg5UvZVEuC6YaYS0X8k4cHM4F-i7JjIAMB_2uKpV5QLmf8MbXIx1fORtlGxN$>
--

Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3937 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-15 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 11:41 Dave Taht
2024-08-15 13:27 ` Livingood, Jason [this message]
2024-08-15 14:16   ` Dave Taht
2024-08-15 14:36     ` Dave Cohen
2024-08-15 15:58     ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-08-15 17:05       ` Dave Taht
2024-08-15 18:06         ` Jack Haverty
2024-08-18 19:32           ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-08-15 19:08 Livingood, Jason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9F54B8F8-3B2B-4F45-A197-E6137A74F492@comcast.com \
    --to=jason_livingood@comcast.com \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox