From: "Livingood, Jason" <jason_livingood@comcast.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] nn back in the news
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 13:27:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9F54B8F8-3B2B-4F45-A197-E6137A74F492@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5ihXaW+923b008shjifyENmmL_RYd9LfQp03t-Fm_bQQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1366 bytes --]
I would say it is not “back” in the news – it has continuously been in the news since the Loper Bright SCOTUS ruling that impacts “Chevron deference” as well the major questions doctrine issue raised in W VA vs EPA. As many people have long said, this will be tied up in the courts for several years.
Personal take – in the long-term it will be better to have legislation that codifies this (as well as a national cross-sector privacy law).
JL
From: Nnagain <nnagain-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date: Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 07:41
To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: [NNagain] nn back in the news
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/isps-ask-supreme-court-to-kill-new-york-law-that-requires-15-broadband-plans/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/isps-ask-supreme-court-to-kill-new-york-law-that-requires-15-broadband-plans/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!FPiUKVoVIIjDuEAjFeVX-ISnAeSb8gI7-H-8Pg5UvZVEuC6YaYS0X8k4cHM4F-i7JjIAMB_2uKpV5QLmf8MbXIx1fORtlGxN$>
--
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3937 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-15 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-15 11:41 Dave Taht
2024-08-15 13:27 ` Livingood, Jason [this message]
2024-08-15 14:16 ` Dave Taht
2024-08-15 14:36 ` Dave Cohen
2024-08-15 15:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-08-15 17:05 ` Dave Taht
2024-08-15 18:06 ` Jack Haverty
2024-08-18 19:32 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-08-15 19:08 Livingood, Jason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9F54B8F8-3B2B-4F45-A197-E6137A74F492@comcast.com \
--to=jason_livingood@comcast.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox