From: "David Bray, PhD" <david.a.bray@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] A good question - do you know how a toilet works?
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:03:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+aeVP-AZS9+8b3fca=YK=eLs=ECPpzr9YNETHv+R+wMn45G-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6ykO8F-kuxcnhd3r=e_u8F4itjdEUzG=1VS3wbs+T99g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1762 bytes --]
Indeed and well said Dave Taht. I particularly like this quote on the
Structure of Scientific Revolutions that may apply here too:
“Newton's three laws of motion are less a product of novel experiments than
of the attempt to reinterpret well-known observations in terms of motions
and interactions of primary neutral corpuscles”
― Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
<https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1748176>
And lest we forget the humanness of our endeavor:
“Max Planck, surveying his own career in his Scientific Autobiography,
sadly remarked that “a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing
its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its
opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar
with it.”
― Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
<https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1748176>
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:28 PM Dave Taht via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Sometimes I liken this debate about the internet, to 1906-era
> partisans arguing about the right cures for syphilis. One side,
> intoning with great authority: "Tinctures of mercury, yes a good dose
> of mercury, is just what you need... " and the other side, insisting
> that "Leeches, leeches will help... all you need is a good
> blood-letting... and everything will be fine..."
>
> While those few that had embraced germ theory and were pointing at
> little squiggly things in microscopes as the root causes of so much
> disease, were laughed at and ignored.
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2897 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <post-137606009@substack.com>
[not found] ` <20231003205640.3.f99276b66eff3df4@mg-d1.substack.com>
2023-10-04 18:46 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-04 19:14 ` David Lang
2023-10-04 19:28 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-04 19:40 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-04 19:46 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-04 19:55 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-04 19:58 ` Dick Roy
2023-10-04 20:03 ` David Bray, PhD [this message]
2023-10-05 3:22 ` le berger des photons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+aeVP-AZS9+8b3fca=YK=eLs=ECPpzr9YNETHv+R+wMn45G-Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.a.bray@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox