From: "David Bray, PhD" <david.a.bray@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] the real state of "smart agriculture"?
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:08:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+aeVP_Akg-bLVSw_sb0oGqHUkjZQoR_2wA289Pfmjn805uSCQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6eGLzkTSNPkxYsDafF_246-sn+qheVFQxbYYB2qK-5dw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3441 bytes --]
Isn’t the rubric that any so called “smart” device really means you can
just replace the words “hackable” for the word smart?
Shouldn’t we be concerned about ransomware hitting farmers who are focused
on farming vs. cybersecurity?
Or - the data exhaust from their farming activities being sold to the
highest bidder for hedge fund and other financial plays pre-market
regarding crop futures?
Oh, and happy Monday all. :-)
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:45 Dave Taht via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> (I am hoping others on this list with real-world AG experience can
> chime in? I enjoy realworld stories about present solutions and pain
> points[2])
>
> I have often been dubious of the 5g hope to dominate any major
> component of a smart ag architecture except perhaps FWA, (where
> starlink is poised and people also want to run fiber) to give it a
> good run for the money- 5g chips are too big, too hard to power, and
> too complex, and come with a monthly billing model and other
> centralized requirements that make organic evolution and solid support
> in remote environments dicy and expensive.
>
> I freely concede that I may be wrong, that with sufficient subsidies,
> we will end up hanging the equivalent of a cellphone off of every
> suitably large piece of gear and ship all the data up to the cloud,
> rather than pre-process locally. Certainly the benefits of gps and
> drones are being shown every day, along with satellite weather and
> other forms of satellite analysis. [1]
>
> But the 5g sensor market? No. Nowadays smart sensors are easily
> constructed out of wifi devices such as these which cost 5 dollars or
> less:
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/DORHEA-Development-Microcontroller-NodeMCU-32S-ESP-WROOM-32/dp/B086MJGFVV/ref=asc_df_B086MJGFVV/
>
> And the more meshy LoRA stuff now has much better range (4 miles), at
> low complexity and power also.
>
> then there are things like amazon sidewalk:
> https://www.amazon.com/Amazon-Sidewalk/b?ie=UTF8&node=21328123011
>
> And airtags.
>
> [1] On the other hand rigorous analysis of the food we produce has
> recently discovered a marked decline in the percentage of nutritious
> minerals over the past 100 years. Please see:
>
> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09637486.2021.1981831
>
> How smart is that?
>
> [2] Massive subsidy and diversion of river resources to the water
> hungry california almond industry during the last 7 years of drought
> led to the cancellation of the salmon fishing season last year.
>
> You should hear some of the invective that I used to hear aimed at
> "the f-ing vegetarians" along the docks I frequent in half moon bay.
> That I used to hear, anyway, The docks are eerily silent, the workers
> at other jobs, the boats not going out for anything except crab and
> squid.
>
> How smart is that? The California water table is a disaster, too. I
> vastly prefer salmon to almonds personally....
>
> I guess a meta point is easily gathering tactical data is one thing,
> sharing it sanely another, deciding on how to use it strategically,
> another.
>
> --
> :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4704 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-13 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-13 12:44 Dave Taht
2023-11-13 13:10 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-11-13 13:31 ` [NNagain] [Starlink] " Nathan Owens
2023-11-13 14:08 ` David Bray, PhD [this message]
2023-11-13 14:23 ` [NNagain] Fork: Future of Work, Sensemaking, and Co-Existence … was previously: " David Bray, PhD
2023-11-13 18:19 ` [NNagain] " dan
2023-11-13 23:22 ` [NNagain] bluetooth occupancy sensing Dave Taht
2023-11-13 23:50 ` dan
2023-11-14 4:07 ` [NNagain] [Starlink] " Dick Roy
2023-11-13 21:10 ` [NNagain] [Starlink] the real state of "smart agriculture"? Dotzero
2023-11-13 23:31 ` [NNagain] " Rohan M
2023-11-16 18:11 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-11-16 18:44 ` Jack Haverty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+aeVP_Akg-bLVSw_sb0oGqHUkjZQoR_2wA289Pfmjn805uSCQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.a.bray@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox