From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [NNagain] The non-death of DSL
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 14:22:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5OPSRFaWY31faKSZvFN4Rj_tSKca66MKwBZTpscER9Qg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I have a lot to unpack from this:
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-397257A1.pdf
the first two on my mind from 2005 are: "FCC adopted its first open
internet policy" and "Competitiveness" As best as I recall, (and
please correct me), this led essentially to the departure of all the
3rd party DSL providers from the field. I had found something
referencing this interpretation that I cannot find right now, but I do
clearly remember all the DSL services you could buy from in the early
00s, and how few you can buy from now. Obviously there are many other
possible root causes.
DSL continued to get better and evolve, but it definately suffers from
many reports of degraded copper quality, but does an estimate exist
for how much working DSL is left?
Q0) How much DSL is in the EU?
Q1) How much DSL is left in the USA?
Q2) What form is it? (VDSL, etc?)
Did competition in DSL vanish because of or not of an FCC related order?
--
Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-07 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-07 21:22 Dave Taht [this message]
2023-10-07 21:34 ` Mark Steckel
2023-10-07 22:13 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-07 23:14 ` Mark Steckel
2023-10-08 0:00 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-08 0:44 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-08 9:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-08 16:37 ` Robert McMahon
2023-10-08 19:27 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-08 20:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-08 20:44 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-09 7:40 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-10 0:13 ` Robert McMahon
2023-10-10 6:13 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-10 8:24 ` Robert McMahon
2023-10-08 19:39 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-08 20:18 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-09 6:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-08 0:07 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-08 10:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-08 7:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-11 13:58 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2023-10-12 7:25 ` Pedro Tumusok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw5OPSRFaWY31faKSZvFN4Rj_tSKca66MKwBZTpscER9Qg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox