From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [NNagain] FCC - delete, delete, delete
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:39:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6z7H5SPRt5VK0zoLFWf2WDeBsLTvpWWwWcL7O_KLukwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
See: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-219A1.pdf
... the Commission has opened a new docket, titled “In re: Delete,
Delete, Delete,” in which the agency seeks comment “on every rule,
regulation, or guidance document that the FCC should eliminate for the
purposes of alleviating unnecessary regulatory burdens.”
I don't have a big list (today!) of what I've found unnecessarily
restrictive. I find many of the rules around ham radio and the
internet pretty overly restrictive, and thought that the outdoor
licensing system for wifi6 pretty painful (but that seems to be mostly
resolved). Most of the stuff
I care about seems to require more regulation not less (router
security, deploying AQM and FQ technology). I wish it didn't.
My impression is that the FCC is not going to regain any authority
over the internet more than they have and title II is dead. They might
get spectrum authority back (which would be a good thing IMHO).
What oxes will get put up to be gored?
What programs need to be preserved?
--
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQoS
"A perfect storm" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQX1PmRULU0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 17:39 Dave Taht [this message]
2025-03-13 0:00 ` Richard Roy
2025-03-13 16:33 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-13 17:00 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-03-13 18:36 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-13 23:59 ` David Lang
2025-03-14 1:12 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14 1:38 ` David Bray, PhD
2025-03-14 2:17 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14 2:20 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14 2:24 ` David Bray, PhD
2025-03-14 8:16 ` Tara Stella
2025-03-14 18:53 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14 19:05 ` Richard Roy
2025-03-14 21:09 ` David Lang
2025-03-14 21:20 ` Dick Roy
2025-03-14 21:48 ` David Lang
2025-03-15 18:16 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-15 18:49 ` Daniel Ezell
2025-03-16 17:50 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-15 18:50 ` Robert McMahon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6z7H5SPRt5VK0zoLFWf2WDeBsLTvpWWwWcL7O_KLukwQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox