I wish I shared that forward optimism, but in my experience "network cluefulness" is not abundant even among otherwise technically forward individuals, and "ISP network cluefulness" even less so (FWIW, I believe this applies to employees at ISPs as well). I'm also inclined to believe that most of the "smart regulation is better than no regulation" folks are also generally "regulation suggested/desired by those who stand to profit is bad regulation" folks, which makes real progress challenging when subject matter expertise almost exclusively resides with those in the industry. On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:17 AM Dave Taht via Nnagain < nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > Perhaps it would have been better to say that "one of the sites I read > regularly just put out an update on it." :) > > I like to think that bufferbloat.net's NOI filing did a bit of good, > getting cited 16 times, but not changing the top level conclusions one > iota. Doing another one this year is on my mind in followup, but aside from > harping on our latency points, pointing to progress, and the need for more > IXPs, I don't know what top level items could be addressed, again? I'd have > to buckle down and re-read what resonated, and what didn't. > > Perhaps something might come out of the DNC? > > I have been enjoying Carr's negative posts on BEAD, but there must be some > bright news in that program somewhere by now? > > I am perhaps reading too much into it, but with a potentially younger > crowd moving into office, perhaps more technical clue is arriving? I'm very > happy to see mudge make CIO at darpa. The white house got a cto yet? The > FCC? > > PS Ms Shotwell did a great fireside chat at Mountain Connect: > https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-community-events/shotwell > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 6:27 AM Livingood, Jason < > jason_livingood@comcast.com> wrote: > >> I would say it is not “back” in the news – it has continuously been in >> the news since the Loper Bright SCOTUS ruling that impacts “Chevron >> deference” as well the major questions doctrine issue raised in W VA vs >> EPA. As many people have long said, this will be tied up in the courts for >> several years. >> >> Personal take – in the long-term it will be better to have legislation >> that codifies this (as well as a national cross-sector privacy law). >> >> >> >> JL >> >> >> >> *From: *Nnagain on behalf of >> Dave Taht via Nnagain >> *Reply-To: *Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects >> heard this time! >> *Date: *Thursday, August 15, 2024 at 07:41 >> *To: *Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard >> this time! >> *Cc: *Dave Taht >> *Subject: *[NNagain] nn back in the news >> >> >> >> >> >> https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/isps-ask-supreme-court-to-kill-new-york-law-that-requires-15-broadband-plans/ >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos >> > > > -- > Artists/Musician Campout Aug 9-11 > https://www.eventbrite.com/e/healing-arts-event-tickets-928910826287 > Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos > _______________________________________________ > Nnagain mailing list > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain > -- - Dave Cohen craetdave@gmail.com @dCoSays www.venicesunlight.com