Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Austin <jeremy@aterlo.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 08:58:54 -0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACw=56KRvQK4t6dKUKYKH-+FgYErdB4YcMWAN=e34Fi2dvtVfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ECC2FB5C-8939-409A-9220-32ABCA9F516F@comcast.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1453 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:46 AM Livingood, Jason via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> On the subject of how much bandwidth does one household need, here's a fun
> stat for you.
>
>
>
> At the IETF’s 118th meeting <https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/118/> last
> week (Nov 4 – 10, 2023), there were over 1,000 engineers in attendance. At
> peak there were 870 devices connected to the WiFi network. Peak bandwidth
> usage:
>
>    - Downstream peak ~750 Mbps
>    - Upstream ~250 Mbps
>
>
How was this calculated? That's an unusually high ratio of up to down, so
my suspicion is that they aren't time correlated; they're also not /normal/
or /evening/ peaks, I'm expecting.

There's a big difference between individual peaks of upload and aggregate
peaks of upload; most people aren't streaming high symmetric bandwidth
simultaneously. Consequently a peak busy hour online load, I'm finding, is
still much more like 8:1 over all users (idle and active), in Preseem's
data set.

In addition to speed tests being, like democracy, the worst form of
government except for all the others that have been tried, it would be
instructive both for end users and ISPs to choose, agree on and understand
specific percentiles of expected performance at idle and at peak busy hour.

Has anyone solved the math problem of distinguishing (from outside) a
constraint in supply from a reduction in demand?

Jeremy

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2919 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-14 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-11 16:32 Dave Taht
2023-11-11 18:24 ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-14 15:46 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-11-14 16:06   ` Dave Taht
2023-11-14 16:14     ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-11-14 16:15     ` Dave Taht
2023-11-14 16:26     ` [NNagain] [EXTERNAL] " Livingood, Jason
2023-11-14 16:33     ` [NNagain] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 16:14   ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 16:37     ` Livingood, Jason
2023-11-14 17:00       ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 17:25   ` Vint Cerf
2023-11-14 17:43     ` Dave Taht
2023-11-14 18:10       ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-14 18:02     ` Jack Haverty
2023-11-14 18:10       ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 19:27         ` Jack Haverty
2023-11-14 19:40           ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-14 21:01             ` Dave Taht
2023-11-14 21:45               ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-16  3:41                 ` [NNagain] Metrics for Network Managers (was FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards) Jack Haverty
2023-11-16  6:57                   ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-14 19:53           ` [NNagain] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 20:01             ` David Lang
2023-11-14 20:37               ` Dick Roy
     [not found]                 ` <CA+aeVP8dT-ynmHxNCmZq1OWdw3VBMMJTH0zsL6dGASvfKVpDMQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <CA+aeVP9XyNd1rL_7S7U4OdvOwtVR8Sae8QvtiQLX0HMyzE57Xw@mail.gmail.com>
2023-11-14 20:55                     ` [NNagain] Virtual mtgs and conferences vs. in-person ones (was) " David Bray, PhD
2023-11-15  0:58                       ` Jack Haverty
2023-11-14 20:52             ` [NNagain] " Livingood, Jason
2023-11-16  0:27               ` Jack Haverty
2023-11-16  2:31                 ` Robert McMahon
2023-11-14 18:16       ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-14 18:30         ` rjmcmahon
2023-11-14 17:58   ` Jeremy Austin [this message]
2023-11-14 18:08     ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 18:34     ` [NNagain] [EXTERNAL] " Livingood, Jason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACw=56KRvQK4t6dKUKYKH-+FgYErdB4YcMWAN=e34Fi2dvtVfw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jeremy@aterlo.com \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox