From: the keyboard of geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
To: Starlink <Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [NNagain] SpaceX: "IMPROVING STARLINK’S LATENCY" (via Nathan Owens)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 12:40:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf-zrimzKm+ReDLqXhwEqZ_FJCSko1-qrwn-_LmimD156Wdjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1009 bytes --]
*Super excited to be able to share some of what we have been working on
over the last few months!*
EXCERPT:
*Starlink engineering teams have been focused on improving the performance
of our network with the goal of delivering a service with stable 20
millisecond (ms) median latency and minimal packet loss. *
*Over the past month, we have meaningfully reduced median and worst-case
latency for users around the world. In the United States alone, we reduced
median latency by more than 30%, from 48.5ms to 33ms during hours of peak
usage. Worst-case peak hour latency (p99) has dropped by over 60%, from
over 150ms to less than 65ms. Outside of the United States, we have also
reduced median latency by up to 25% and worst-case latencies by up to
35%...*
[...]
https://api.starlink.com/public-files/StarlinkLatency.pdf
via
https://twitter.com/Starlink/status/1766179308887028005
&
https://twitter.com/VirtuallyNathan/status/1766179789927522460
--
Geoff.Goodfellow@iconia.com
living as The Truth is True
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2960 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 19:40 the keyboard of geoff goodfellow [this message]
2024-03-08 19:50 ` [NNagain] [Starlink] " J Pan
2024-03-08 20:09 ` the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2024-03-08 20:25 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-03-08 20:31 ` Dave Taht
2024-03-08 23:44 ` [NNagain] When Flows Collide? Jack Haverty
2024-03-09 2:57 ` David Lang
2024-03-09 19:08 ` Jack Haverty
2024-03-09 19:45 ` rjmcmahon
2024-03-09 20:08 ` David Lang
2024-03-10 17:41 ` [NNagain] [Starlink] SpaceX: "IMPROVING STARLINK’S LATENCY" (via Nathan Owens) Michael Richardson
2024-03-08 20:30 ` rjmcmahon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEf-zrimzKm+ReDLqXhwEqZ_FJCSko1-qrwn-_LmimD156Wdjg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geoff@iconia.com \
--cc=Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox