Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: the keyboard of geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
To: Starlink <Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [NNagain] SpaceX: "IMPROVING STARLINK’S LATENCY" (via Nathan Owens)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 12:40:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf-zrimzKm+ReDLqXhwEqZ_FJCSko1-qrwn-_LmimD156Wdjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1009 bytes --]

*Super excited to be able to share some of what we have been working on
over the last few months!*
EXCERPT:

*Starlink engineering teams have been focused on improving the performance
of our network with the goal of delivering a service with stable 20
millisecond (ms) median latency and minimal packet loss. *

*Over the past month, we have meaningfully reduced median and worst-case
latency for users around the world. In the United States alone, we reduced
median latency by more than 30%, from 48.5ms to 33ms during hours of peak
usage. Worst-case peak hour latency (p99) has dropped by over 60%, from
over 150ms to less than 65ms. Outside of the United States, we have also
reduced median latency by up to 25% and worst-case latencies by up to
35%...*

[...]
https://api.starlink.com/public-files/StarlinkLatency.pdf
via
https://twitter.com/Starlink/status/1766179308887028005
&
https://twitter.com/VirtuallyNathan/status/1766179789927522460


-- 
Geoff.Goodfellow@iconia.com
living as The Truth is True

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2960 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-08 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08 19:40 the keyboard of geoff goodfellow [this message]
2024-03-08 19:50 ` [NNagain] [Starlink] " J Pan
2024-03-08 20:09   ` the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2024-03-08 20:25     ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-03-08 20:31     ` Dave Taht
2024-03-08 23:44       ` [NNagain] When Flows Collide? Jack Haverty
2024-03-09  2:57         ` David Lang
2024-03-09 19:08           ` Jack Haverty
2024-03-09 19:45             ` rjmcmahon
2024-03-09 20:08             ` David Lang
2024-03-10 17:41       ` [NNagain] [Starlink] SpaceX: "IMPROVING STARLINK’S LATENCY" (via Nathan Owens) Michael Richardson
2024-03-08 20:30   ` rjmcmahon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEf-zrimzKm+ReDLqXhwEqZ_FJCSko1-qrwn-_LmimD156Wdjg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geoff@iconia.com \
    --cc=Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox