How do you know where the vehicle is that you are talking to? V On Sat, Mar 9, 2024, 17:26 Dick Roy via Nnagain < nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Robert McMahon [mailto:rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, March 9, 2024 12:58 PM > *To:* dickroy@alum.mit.edu; Dick Roy via Nnagain > *Subject:* Re: [NNagain] Verizon, T-Mobile, Nokia get noisy on network > slicing and net neutrality (LightReading) > > > > > > What is DSRC? > > *[RR] Don’t get me started! **LLL** Very simply it is the optimal > technology for V2X comms (it is in over 11 billion devices on the planet > today … aka Wi-Fi at 5.9GHz … think 802.11a) that has been shelved here in > the US (temporarily if I have anything to say about it) in favor of an > 8-year old technology that does not work and on which a single company has > a majority of the IPR. Surprise, surprise, that company has invested 100’s > of millions of dollars to execute this con job, and unfortunately it’s > working. DSRC products were available more than 8 years ago and would have > been on the roads today (and in handsets) in large numbers saving lives, > but that wasn’t good enough for that company because they stand to get >10x > in royalty fees if and when the FCC mandates their technology. When the > general public becomes aware of this con, and fully understands the impact, > they should be and will be outraged! Think “DOWNFALL: The Case Against > Boeing” … it’s exactly the same thing … just the names have been changed. > Watch it if you haven’t already!* > > *Contact me if you want more details! I am looking for any and ALL help I > can get to expose this fraud.* > > *Cheers,* > > *RR * > > > > DSRC (Dedicated Short-Range Communications) is a wireless communication > technology that enables vehicles to communicate with each other and other > road users directly, without involving cellular or other infrastructure. > DSRC is based on WiFi technology > > > > https://auto-talks.com/technology/dsrc-technology/#:~:text=What%20is%20DSRC%3F,involving%20cellular%20or%20other%20infrastructure > . > > On Mar 9, 2024, at 12:42 PM, Dick Roy via Nnagain < > nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > > > > > … > > > > As expected this technique is designed to allow exactly what NN was > designed to prohibit (treating packets differentially in the internet based > on economic considerations*)... this is IMHO why instead of calling a spade > a spade mobile carriers avoid describing this in a useful way, as it is > exactly about prioritisation... IMHO that will back fire, and a better > avenue would be to be open about what it enables and propose a method to > restrict the potential issues. E.g. (I am making this up on the fly, so it > will likely not hold up to any degree of scrutiny) by self limiting to > never commit more than X% of a cell's capacity to slicing, IFF the cell is > used for normal end user service at all. So admit that there is some > trade-off here, limit the fall-out, and then describe why we as a society > should embrace that trade-off. I am a bit sceptical about the whole car 2 > car communication thing (that is cars talk to cars, not people n cars talk > to people on cars ;) ), but if a Carrier believes there is value in that > for e.g. accident avoidance, then tell how this requires the stricter > network guarantees that (only?) slicing can deliver. > > *[RR] V2X communications for saving lives will NEVER go through ANY > carrier’s network in spite of what you hear. There is simply no way anyone > is going to pay to have BSMs broadcast 10 times a second to prevent > accidents, and NO CARRIER is going to give that capacity away for free, > even if they had enough to carry the traffic, which they do not by many > orders of magnitude!!! More importantly, the information being exchanged > does NOT require a network to get where it needs to go! The 5G hype you > hear from various carriers and equipment suppliers related to V2X > communications is all powerpoint BS (to make shareholders happy). And there > is a ton of it out there! **JJ* > > > > RR > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Nnagain mailing list > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain > > _______________________________________________ > Nnagain mailing list > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain >