Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
To: Robert McMahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
Cc: "Dave Taht via Starlink" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical a spects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	dickroy@alum.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [NNagain] [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 07:11:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJUtOOgtHmvU8-77dNjfeP0LERw0K36xc30fHq2ZhbsL6yijWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55037f9a-bc2c-4bbb-a4bb-47ad30f16190@rjmcmahon.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4337 bytes --]

Thanks, Robert. Exactly what I meant. Therefore I added NN list, because
Nathan was engaging with us there, and with Dave (me and some others, to my
knowledge) either directly or via his staffers and he really wanted to
catch up on tech things that are the culprits of Net Neutrality
(bufferbloat.)

So instead of assuming that Nathan Simington and Brendan Carr are “bought”
as someone did, I can the FCC itself as an entity can be understaffed at
worse.

But still, I appreciate efforts to learn about what’s going in here and
getting it right.

All the best,

Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik@gmail.com


On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 3:46 AM, Robert McMahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
wrote:

> I think this common in that appointment of commissioners go through a
> political process. The FCC has a technology group, too. When I worked with
> them about 8 years ago, they had skilled researchers on staff and a highly
> skilled director. They asked good questions about engineering decisions,
> like what is limiting the number of mimo streams on devices.
>
> Their physical facility is a bit dated, and they don't get stock grants. I
> respect the engineers I worked with for what they did.
>
> Bob
> On Dec 13, 2023, at 2:38 PM, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <
> nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>> I would love for Nathan to be here with us, and comment on that :-) so I
>> will add NN list as well.
>>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Frank
>> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
>> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
>> Skype: casioa5302ca
>> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:21 PM, Richard Roy <dickroy3777@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* Starlink [mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Frantisek Borsik via Starlink
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 1:26 PM
>>> *To:* Dave Taht via Starlink
>>> *Subject:* [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink’s RDOF Application
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> “*Elon Musk*’s Starlink was not the only major company to inflate its
>>> capabilities
>>> <https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2021/04/rdof-reverse-auction-criticized-google-makes-pandemic-gains-california-broadband-access-for-k-12/> in
>>> RDOF bids. Nearly 100 bidders have defaulted since the auction, leaving in
>>> limbo an estimated $2.8 billion
>>> <https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/06/what-happens-to-the-estimated-2-8-billion-in-rdof-defaults/> of
>>> the $9.2 billion originally awarded.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The FCC upheld another denial
>>> <https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-proposes-22-million-fine-against-ltd-over-rdof/>
>>>  on Monday in the case of LTD Broadband, which appealed the
>>> commission’s finding that it could not reasonably serve the more than
>>> 500,000 locations to which it had committed. The commission also hit LTD
>>> with a $21.7 million fine for its default.
>>>
>>> The commission’s two Republicans dissented to Starlink’s denial,
>>> claiming they saw a path for the company to improve its speeds before the
>>> first deployment deadline in 2025.”
>>>
>>> *[RR] The reason two lawyers “saw a path” is because they were
>>> bribed/conned into to see it. In my nearly 50years of experience dealing
>>> with the FCC, extremely rarely are the people at the top in the commission
>>> tech savvy.  In general, they have NO CLUE when it comes to technology …
>>> period! **JJ*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-upholds-denial-of-starlinks-rdof-application/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>
>>> Frank
>>> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>>>
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>>> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
>>> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
>>> Skype: casioa5302ca
>>> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Nnagain mailing list
>> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14241 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-14  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAJUtOOi7rSiPTFGVkadh4XPvFOnmzLidX5=7-LTJnoiyPauNag@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <A8DC9114A92F47D5AAE1D332B5E5007D@SRA6>
2023-12-13 22:38   ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14  2:46     ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-14  6:11       ` Frantisek Borsik [this message]
2023-12-14 17:48         ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-14 18:47           ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14 18:51           ` Nathan Simington
2023-12-14 19:44             ` Frantisek Borsik
     [not found]             ` <f7d6522d-db06-4ee6-a814-76810ad01e1f@gmail.com>
     [not found]               ` <ZXxIdbzif5ogB0IQ@Space.Net>
     [not found]                 ` <02cc2879-ef99-4388-bc1e-335a4aaff6aa@gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <ZXxKMZ-pEbS4QAzW@Space.Net>
2023-12-15 12:46                     ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-15 13:24                       ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 13:40                       ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-15 18:06                         ` David Lang
2023-12-15 18:51                           ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 19:13                             ` David Lang
2023-12-15 21:29                               ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 21:42                                 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:04                                   ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-15 22:10                                     ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:13                                       ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-15 22:33                                         ` Kenline, Doug
2023-12-15 22:36                                         ` Dave Taht
2023-12-17 21:22                                           ` Tanya Weiman
     [not found]                                         ` <de59330f-e05a-4c2e-9d64-e2821f113e76@gmail.com>
2023-12-19 20:49                                           ` [NNagain] detecting GPT-generated text Rich Brown
2023-12-22 12:23                                             ` le berger des photons
2023-12-22 13:06                                               ` Rich Brown
2023-12-15 22:05                                   ` [NNagain] [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 22:13                                     ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:26                                   ` Dave Taht
2023-12-16  4:16                                     ` David Lang
2023-12-16 17:30                                       ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-16 18:18                                         ` Dick Roy
2023-12-16 18:48                                         ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-16 21:44                                           ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-16 22:28                                             ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-17  0:25                                               ` Dave Taht
2023-12-23 21:17                                                 ` J Pan
2023-12-18  8:25                                               ` David Lang
2023-12-17  1:54             ` [NNagain] other fcc services at sea Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJUtOOgtHmvU8-77dNjfeP0LERw0K36xc30fHq2ZhbsL6yijWg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
    --cc=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox