From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6A63CB38 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:46:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d34030ebb2so6107097a12.1 for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 09:46:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733766397; x=1734371197; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mq3sDoCmn2bvK7fgdvLLhnJp6j+DP8XoXqkLqd+Ht1k=; b=f1Bw12SnYCqh3i5lQpUdyE6h/tsDLbPz0nM2hVeE++ESvJAn0MUBFUTuunlteeGanA 2L/kFtWy19FWzBHEnZyZjSgAReCyJBvb6XY3FIkFSK+dWznynJ21cjGRh6G1JjBEXKkQ DfBLFzHXgeaxbC3ImB577q2TxTDU58PH52E2cEeC9kzqV8d7lHgW+lGoNVzvnJvfpWRJ PnFaVCuSG0MzG0RAtv8VPZQ4mpKWoK6UdCaAU3fT0GwS8S2wnUX6h4EQFUDp/xTlCiQX z45uJvCmFfhEMzcsjVGNx1YMRsvIv5RCAuBoO6+p2oDEh5HRktPCmzTZWVYZKFNoiKF6 3aeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733766397; x=1734371197; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=mq3sDoCmn2bvK7fgdvLLhnJp6j+DP8XoXqkLqd+Ht1k=; b=VK9aOCOUG8SlEEA77g6MSutgVXIFa4dlxHkL8H78R9h44nf0aVaH/ft6n1KUKfJ5Ub 0gDEnL56r/K/vvFsNhewNEOYjZJyqkgz31FsUgkP1TdiILBjPITC+s1x2emgMRzdP5KE TkqiEKn1+NOetyT7Q9A4aQxuMTLwPbCyE/Z2qgHcYIHQ10c0SUlToWh+CRJkq6kAbEDh aBSkrqNAQHuoaTlFVdsduMX5044EorZiWbgzm9aFxco3ZamsvFpChjj/VfbUqo3Arqe0 KwPnbwK15e+7M5jXbkZ2ypE9qOfCJPqvTn+R53yLTPTLSFrG4sYMSjr/+fd5SPM7JMnr YVxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHD5hro48240RCsjGKlGAv5lfHpfaaDt/aH4auyr3gbhJs5aN6 doIYOtmlc5u9tKpJDNz2ABoY10lEpk9ZXoiBWXVENDJh8Vte5h1bkul7EL6sHpwHDwGqtgGIVmI /eKfIh0FjYg7CE+Wpm/SLNUm5/lV56A== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncteQOJNb8p6twz4kVnnGUDuc3FmYaq+b24S7zIEBuHcUQ70ylggJUaeQM4fXqn h5ORZ4WRJg1j9HE78ue/avXoQNMhc+bcV X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHVjZstBAcCPvD3AOZiPpAmWdTuCnqMTTN+vaFQnywTo2LzIfWbv/vCG+uDJaillc+ZiFAJ7M5jIg5vqn0FaAU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:18a9:b0:aa6:7881:1e84 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aa69cd375ebmr156600266b.15.1733766397033; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 09:46:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Frantisek Borsik Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 18:46:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Network_Neutrality_is_back=21_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_asp?= =?UTF-8?Q?ects_heard_this_time=21?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003804f90628d9f210" Subject: Re: [NNagain] ntia explicitly excludes latency under load from bead measurements X-BeenThere: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?= List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 17:46:38 -0000 --0000000000003804f90628d9f210 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Are they retarded, or what? LOL All the best, Frank Frantisek (Frank) Borsik https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 Skype: casioa5302ca frantisek.borsik@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 6:42=E2=80=AFPM Dave Taht via Nnagain < nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > from: > > > https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/draft_performance_measur= es_for_bead_last-mile_networks_policy_notice.pdf > > "For latency testing, a provider must conduct a minimum of one test > per minute =E2=80=94 60 tests per hour =E2=80=94 for each testing hour. I= f the > consumer load during a latency test exceeds 200,000 bits per second > downstream,26 the provider may cancel the test and reevaluate whether > the consumer load exceeds 200,000 bits per second downstream before > retrying the test in the next minute." > > w/a 100ms baseline. Hilarious. Sad. > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos > _______________________________________________ > Nnagain mailing list > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain > --0000000000003804f90628d9f210 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Are they retarded, or what? LOL

<= div>
All the best,

Frank

Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

=C2=A0<= /u>

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik

Signal, Telegram,= WhatsApp: +421919416714=C2=A0

iMessage, mobile: +420775230885

=

Skype: casioa5302ca=

frantisek.borsik@gmail.com



On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 6:42=E2=80=AFPM Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net= > wrote:
from:

https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/draft= _performance_measures_for_bead_last-mile_networks_policy_notice.pdf

"For latency testing, a provider must conduct a minimum of one test per minute =E2=80=94 60 tests per hour =E2=80=94 for each testing hour. If = the
consumer load during a latency test exceeds 200,000 bits per second
downstream,26 the provider may cancel the test and reevaluate whether
the consumer load exceeds 200,000 bits per second downstream before
retrying the test in the next minute."

w/a 100ms baseline. Hilarious. Sad.

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos
_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@= lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
--0000000000003804f90628d9f210--