From: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] Spam filtering
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:50:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJUtOOjGm_eC4n29JjnXu7_dBUhys5iYd58wzV061=r2gR0Y8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6_sjQ0PR=oWeYn3LZVnVcYeMd1apkJ0aqBdyhqc5tFYA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4687 bytes --]
I just can't even. So many garbage ideas out of Brussels as of late. DSA,
DMA, DSM... GDPR in the past, or even that horrible CRA = Cyber Resilience
Act:
https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2022/10/the-eus-proposed-cyber-resilience-act-will-damage-the-open-source-ecosystem/
https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/open-source-software-vs-the-cyber-resilience-act/
Good intentions don't count, bad results do. Most of the evil in this world
was done by people with good intentions and this is not an exception.
All the best,
Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 1:45 AM Dave Taht via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:23 PM Nathan Simington via Nnagain
> <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > This has gone from mere cost-shifting to protocol takeover. Self-hosting
> is essentially dead because you are guaranteed to get filtered by Outlook
> and Gmail, which means that there is de facto embrace-and-extend -- "best
> viewed in Internet Explorer at 800x600" but for a core standard.
>
> This is one of those things that could be reversed if there was law
> guaranteeing freedom of communications. That really does not seem to
> be the way the world is going, however.
>
> See: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/ for example.
>
> I like email (and netnews). You had a copy, the recipients had copies,
> and pretty much anyone that had the capability of snooping in-between
> had copies. Nobody ever got arround to making starttls mandatory.
> Compare this to all the even more centralized, but incompatible chat
> systems since, multiple ones that have vanished from the web (g+), and
> others that are barely hanging on, like disquis.
>
> Even with the flight to mastodon and other heavily encrypted home
> server technologies, email remains the most common, useful and
> malleable public identifier for connecting people to people. I would
> like to make it better, for everyone, again.
>
>
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:48 PM Hal Murray via Nnagain <
> nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> [Was Amtrack]
> >>
> >>
> >> > 2) I could get mad that I figure 80% of this new email list is
> vanishing into
> >> > spam boxes.
> >>
> >>
> >> > What of the 10s of thousands of other emails that have come over the
> years
> >> > not just from lists.bufferbloat.net but from people trying honestly
> to
> >> > communicate?
> >>
> >> There is/was a good discussion of all the good things that network
> geeks have
> >> done.
> >>
> >> How about discussing the things they haven't done?
> >>
> >> Spam would be pretty high on my list. It's tangled up with
> (in)security -- a
> >> lot comes from infected systems or phished accounts.
> >>
> >> The current approach to spam is cost shifting. If you don't pay for
> your
> >> abuse desk, the crap that you send or phishing sites you host..., means
> that
> >> the rest of the net has to spend more on defense.
> >>
> >> Anybody remember Spamford Wallace? He was going to setup a spam
> friendly ISP.
> >> Nobody would connect to him. I wonder what would happen if a few ISPs
> that
> >> host a lot of abuse had more troubles getting connected to the net.
> Would a
> >> few well publicized examples be enough to spread the word?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> High on my list would be dis/mis-information. The business model seems
> to be
> >> to show customers things that will keep them online so you can show
> them more
> >> ads. Gues what does that?
> >>
> >> Is this also cost shifting? It's society as a whole that has to pay
> for the
> >> disruption caused by bogus information.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nnagain mailing list
> >> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nathan Simington
> > cell: 305-793-6899
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nnagain mailing list
> > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
>
>
> --
> Oct 30:
> https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-28 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-27 19:37 [NNagain] An Amtrak trip through the real world yesterday Dave Taht
2023-10-27 19:58 ` Jack Haverty
2023-10-27 21:18 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-27 21:48 ` [NNagain] Spam filtering Hal Murray
2023-10-27 23:23 ` Nathan Simington
2023-10-27 23:45 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-28 10:50 ` Frantisek Borsik [this message]
2025-04-06 1:21 ` Daniel Ezell
2025-04-06 10:23 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-04-06 14:22 ` Tanya Weiman
2025-04-06 18:11 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-10-28 16:55 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-28 10:04 ` [NNagain] An Amtrak trip through the real world yesterday Frantisek Borsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJUtOOjGm_eC4n29JjnXu7_dBUhys5iYd58wzV061=r2gR0Y8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox