This has gone from mere cost-shifting to protocol takeover. Self-hosting is essentially dead because you are guaranteed to get filtered by Outlook and Gmail, which means that there is de facto embrace-and-extend -- "best viewed in Internet Explorer at 800x600" but for a core standard. On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:48 PM Hal Murray via Nnagain < nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > [Was Amtrack] > > > > 2) I could get mad that I figure 80% of this new email list is vanishing > into > > spam boxes. > > > > What of the 10s of thousands of other emails that have come over the > years > > not just from lists.bufferbloat.net but from people trying honestly to > > communicate? > > There is/was a good discussion of all the good things that network geeks > have > done. > > How about discussing the things they haven't done? > > Spam would be pretty high on my list. It's tangled up with (in)security > -- a > lot comes from infected systems or phished accounts. > > The current approach to spam is cost shifting. If you don't pay for your > abuse desk, the crap that you send or phishing sites you host..., means > that > the rest of the net has to spend more on defense. > > Anybody remember Spamford Wallace? He was going to setup a spam friendly > ISP. > Nobody would connect to him. I wonder what would happen if a few ISPs > that > host a lot of abuse had more troubles getting connected to the net. > Would a > few well publicized examples be enough to spread the word? > > > > High on my list would be dis/mis-information. The business model seems to > be > to show customers things that will keep them online so you can show them > more > ads. Gues what does that? > > Is this also cost shifting? It's society as a whole that has to pay for > the > disruption caused by bogus information. > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nnagain mailing list > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain > -- Nathan Simington cell: 305-793-6899