From: le berger des photons <thejoff@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] Small ISP Carve Out
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:08:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO-LeMw4oZ=2MQWH6tLKzexhR2cG-6946g4B7AsFcsUMB7CqWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7FAB46F4-EA85-446F-BCC0-B79C03E0C11D@comcast.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]
but an ISP and its clients should be able to agree together on anything
which they feel works for them. The only rule that I see that should apply
is that there should be proper disclosure. This rule already exists. It
is contract law. All of this regulation would make it impossible for an
Isp and its customers to do something that they all WANT to do.
That would be like them deciding to dump their waste oil all over the
ground IF they had their own planet. Though that would be perhaps stupid,
all of the affected people agree to it, they should be able to do it.
It's THEIR planet!
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:45 PM Livingood, Jason via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> “Small Broadband Providers Urge FCC to Leave Them Out of Some Net
> Neutrality Rules” See
> https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/10/small-broadband-providers-urge-fcc-to-leave-them-out-of-some-net-neutrality-rules/.
> My personal opinion is any rules should apply to all providers. After all,
> my locally-owned small car mechanic does not get to opt out of EPA rules
> for used motor oil disposal since they are small and have 4 employees and
> small organic farms don’t get to opt out of food safety rules or labeling.
>
>
>
> JL
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2616 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 14:45 Livingood, Jason
2023-10-17 16:42 ` Jeremy Austin
2023-10-17 17:14 ` Spencer Sevilla
2023-10-18 7:08 ` le berger des photons [this message]
2023-10-18 8:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAO-LeMw4oZ=2MQWH6tLKzexhR2cG-6946g4B7AsFcsUMB7CqWA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=thejoff@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=thejoff@mail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox