Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: le berger des photons <thejoff@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] Carr blasts BEAD
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:22:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO-LeMwDf_0yJH3oiDeCHnwQCWryn27r-yFceUs84-dnPZMAQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4F0AGo=yf5w0ct5xkFO_=XwAc=+7ZE86hbg89q+r18aA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1550 bytes --]

maybe they'll pay some attention to you in 18 months when the only ISP
doing well will be ones that are either owned by the Rothschilds or trade a
month of internet for some eggs and a chicken.

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:57 PM Dave Taht via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> Some good rhetoric here: https://x.com/BrendanCarrFCC
>
> I have been boggling at some of the hurdles required to get this funding.
> I gave up on BEAD last year, as the goalposts seem to be forever receding
> and mounted on unicorns dancing on cotton candy clouds. I know there is
> more progress being made than meets the eye, but to me it's in spite of
> BEAD, rather than because of it. ("in spite" meaning - you are going to
> subsidize WHAT??)
>
> My pithy comment about the "fiber party".
>
> Bead has provided employment to a lot of telephone polishers, political
> hacks, and paper pushers. I tried to point out that many of the goals could
> be achieved by better software on wireless networks; the fiber party took
> it over. And oh! Did they party!
>
> https://x.com/mtaht/status/1803510661093392667
>
> And for the records, I actually rather liked the ACP program. And LibreQos
> passed 154 ISPs deploying it yesterday.
>
> --
> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7203400057172180992/
> Donations Drive.
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2748 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-19 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19 20:57 Dave Taht
2024-06-19 21:22 ` le berger des photons [this message]
2024-06-19 22:18   ` Robert McMahon
2024-06-20  7:08     ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-20 21:37       ` Robert McMahon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAO-LeMwDf_0yJH3oiDeCHnwQCWryn27r-yFceUs84-dnPZMAQw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=thejoff@gmail.com \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox