maybe they'll pay some attention to you in 18 months when the only ISP doing well will be ones that are either owned by the Rothschilds or trade a month of internet for some eggs and a chicken.

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:57 PM Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
Some good rhetoric here: https://x.com/BrendanCarrFCC

I have been boggling at some of the hurdles required to get this funding. I gave up on BEAD last year, as the goalposts seem to be forever receding and mounted on unicorns dancing on cotton candy clouds. I know there is more progress being made than meets the eye, but to me it's in spite of BEAD, rather than because of it. ("in spite" meaning - you are going to subsidize WHAT??) 

My pithy comment about the "fiber party".

Bead has provided employment to a lot of telephone polishers, political hacks, and paper pushers. I tried to point out that many of the goals could be achieved by better software on wireless networks; the fiber party took it over. And oh! Did they party!

https://x.com/mtaht/status/1803510661093392667

And for the records, I actually rather liked the ACP program. And LibreQos passed 154 ISPs deploying it yesterday.

--
_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain