From: Joe Hamelin <nethead@gmail.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Internet-history <internet-history@elists.isoc.org>,
NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] The rise and fall of the 90's telecom bubble
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 19:46:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO0-hXb7KFXHqppK_7LN0pX0ghQAztb93ZgBvxyJhc6ZjrP5sQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4yzi65iaxkNbJwquM1sWRr1K7mZCJsA=4-=vYNmHPcWQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3556 bytes --]
I started my TCP life (moving from broadcast engineering) back in about
'94ish. I was in Yakima, WA and took care of the 9 working modems for
Wolfe.net after being on connected.com and teleport.com (Portland, OR). My
girlfriend (later my wife), who I met online via the unix talk command got
hired with me by Wolfe and moved to Seattle. We worked with them for a few
years during the dial-up days and moved on to one of their customers where
we had massive growth and 2.5Gb/s of pipe in 1998 (yes, it was pr0n.) Then
I went to AMZN and got their first netblock after haggling with ARIN at a
BOF at NANOG 19 in Atlanta. See back then, AMZN could only justify a /22
since we were just a website. Many years later I landed in corporate
aerospace and will likely die here at my keyboard.
Anyway, now when the youngins ask me technical TCP/IP questions I like to
start off with, "Well, back when we were building the Internet..."
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 7:49 AM Dave Taht via Nnagain <
nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Aside from me pinning the start of the bubble closer to 1992 when
> commercial activity was allowed, and M&A for ISPs at insane valuations
> per subscriber by 1995 (I had co-founded an ISP in 93, but try as I
> might I cannot remember if it peaked at 50 or 60x1 by 1996 (?) and
> crashed by 97 (?)), this was a whacking good read, seems accurate, and
> moves to comparing it across that to the present day AI bubble.
>
> https://www.fabricatedknowledge.com/p/lessons-from-history-the-rise-and
>
> In the end we sold (my ISP, founded 93) icanect for 3 cents on the
> dollar in 99, and I lost my shirt (not for the first time) on it, only
> to move into embedded Linux (Montavista) after the enormous pop
> redhat's IPO had had in 99. The company I was part of slightly prior
> (Mediaplex) went public December 12, 1999 and cracked 100/share, only
> to crash by march, 2000 to half the IPO price (around $7 as I recall),
> wiping out everyone that had not vested yet. I lost my shirt again on
> that and Montavista too and decided I would avoid VCs henceforth.
>
> I am always interested in anecdotal reports of personal events in this
> increasingly murky past, and in trying to fact check the above link.
>
> So much fiber got laid by 2000 that it is often claimed that it was at
> least a decade before it was used up, (the article says only 2.7% was
> in use by 2002) and I have always wondered how much dark, broken,
> inaccessible fiber remains that nobody knows where it even is anymore
> due to many lost databases. I hear horror stories...
>
> The article also focuses solely on the us sector, and I am wondering
> what it looked like worldwide.
>
> I believed in the 90s we were seeing major productivity gains. The
> present expansion of the internet in my mind should not be much
> associated with "productivity gains", as, imho, reducing the general
> population to two thumbs and a 4 inch screen strikes me as an enormous
> step backwards.
>
> (I have a bad habit of cross posting my mails to where older denizens
> of the internet reside, sorry! If you end up posting to one of my
> lists I will add a sender allows filter for you)
> --
> :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
--
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4559 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-13 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-12 15:48 Dave Taht
2023-11-12 20:22 ` Nathan Simington
2023-11-13 11:28 ` Dave Taht
2023-11-13 13:54 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-11-13 14:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-13 21:08 ` Dick Roy
2023-11-14 12:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-14 12:41 ` Dave Taht
2023-11-16 11:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-11-16 17:02 ` Dick Roy
2023-11-16 17:20 ` Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
2023-11-16 17:40 ` Dick Roy
2023-11-16 22:03 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-11-13 3:46 ` Joe Hamelin [this message]
2023-11-14 13:48 ` Mike Hammett
2023-11-13 19:27 odlyzko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAO0-hXb7KFXHqppK_7LN0pX0ghQAztb93ZgBvxyJhc6ZjrP5sQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nethead@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=internet-history@elists.isoc.org \
--cc=joe@hamelin.us \
--cc=nanog@nanog.org \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox