Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Douglas Goncz  A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990" <DGoncz@replikon.net>
To: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [NNagain] Flash Priority
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:56:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnAEVY_2LiR1cTdp1dzXNHqbzGDT4X7a5+aXi709BosWpN2YA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.5.1710003601.27690.nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]

I think some of the cogent points made were

Just because something is in an RFC and recognized or accepted RFC does not
mean it's been established

Ancient rfcs can age out into abandoned protocols

I got the distinct impression now and I think it's reasonable flash
priority is an abandoned protocol

I will stay with firstnet and the engineers there to make sure I have
reliable communication in the event of an Internet emergency so that I can
do what I do best which is help other people and I thank you all for
helping me with this issue.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 812 bytes --]

       reply	other threads:[~2024-03-09 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.5.1710003601.27690.nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2024-03-09 17:56 ` Douglas Goncz  A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 [this message]
2024-03-09 18:08   ` Dave Cohen
     [not found] <mailman.2416.1709929573.1074.nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2024-03-09  2:31 ` [NNagain] Flash priority Douglas Goncz  A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990
2024-03-09  3:01   ` David Lang
2024-03-09 14:38     ` Livingood, Jason
2024-03-09 15:04       ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-03-09 18:38       ` rjmcmahon
2024-03-09 18:43         ` rjmcmahon
2024-03-09 21:01           ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-03-09 22:36             ` rjmcmahon
2024-03-10  2:52         ` Lee
2024-03-10  3:49           ` rjmcmahon
2024-03-09  3:22   ` Dick Roy
2024-03-09  9:41   ` Vint Cerf
2024-03-10 15:39     ` Joe Hamelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOnAEVY_2LiR1cTdp1dzXNHqbzGDT4X7a5+aXi709BosWpN2YA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dgoncz@replikon.net \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox