From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <517635176358552@replikon.net> Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 400FE3B29D for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:56:42 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6e50e8dcc72so1173372a34.3 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 09:56:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=replikon.net; s=google; t=1710007001; x=1710611801; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kDZkcZjRRpKCXDkexiNKT9LuATfax9FwCzQ/YGVK7Uc=; b=ZC1cxBuKHT6XPCRpSwuCL3e7uqDt2UgRQiKwmXVHdmZJ60CjCs7LGIsbFuEk/V/hn+ 9cjsxrASGFjeuOLsT62oPUTSen+3TSPzGl5R9Vg+v+HgWFc32BKGq9pWprgi4qUjdlz/ R70zB3H3XfUMb+FfCjujcQEMGLG1lvN4PW+0I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710007001; x=1710611801; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kDZkcZjRRpKCXDkexiNKT9LuATfax9FwCzQ/YGVK7Uc=; b=p4di/9OXRsdzDrIKqgiCBURIo0ux85dnnbtkHANFVj+G0iSV7fSvohxPgp570abAoi n9BAYCToQpNfA+5Y3nTWX9EBuVbskviZkNfh0Xo103ObHhIRp7MV0DR5E1KpVZqRO3Gd RNVWgvASd2jb04EyMH51qRICmPZv1r/b+s6tGswVx1LhkSpw86GcsCsLKKAAM/aO6/f4 TalmzquBNTnoZbg8MMB+LZzVeToMWTxT2xZaPIKy3jkJ/Wvj5jfggSO0BhU3BXeDNHed OuHnCZLSz2Xhaw+b23sno4SqlJoUoioharQHW6v2dTEAK/eafCdHG9i5e96fI55n8vAs /3hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyPDBudgGhh3hAxp756sfTgoj4De7OolsinsU78wuJyzqgzSXdd Sy8anaMHuG8m4tJQ9v950dQ8JravpDX2PkfrMdVP5q/2M+ovShmsiBURgioAFP8DdyQOb5Y3xXJ z85UNyIT5I0YbxI0tnFbgQTU51POEaIp4CjTxMABkCVPp/taJF+U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIc5eIrWDTioOuWj7K/+V6HLEHaq5CYUIInWN7vTxW8VPQshAmvcFEULO0BXTOPQZoXjdo5hpNFm+OR3IkjQs= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:638a:0:b0:6e4:ef0f:68e1 with SMTP id w10-20020a9d638a000000b006e4ef0f68e1mr2092443otk.31.1710007001126; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 09:56:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990" Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:56:29 -0500 Message-ID: To: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ddb3d206133e07d2" Subject: Re: [NNagain] Flash Priority X-BeenThere: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?= List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 17:56:42 -0000 --000000000000ddb3d206133e07d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I think some of the cogent points made were Just because something is in an RFC and recognized or accepted RFC does not mean it's been established Ancient rfcs can age out into abandoned protocols I got the distinct impression now and I think it's reasonable flash priority is an abandoned protocol I will stay with firstnet and the engineers there to make sure I have reliable communication in the event of an Internet emergency so that I can do what I do best which is help other people and I thank you all for helping me with this issue. --000000000000ddb3d206133e07d2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think some of the cogent points made were

Just because something is in an RFC and rec= ognized or accepted RFC does not mean it's been established

Ancient rfcs can age out into aband= oned protocols

I got the= distinct impression now and I think it's reasonable flash priority is = an abandoned protocol

I = will stay with firstnet and the engineers there to make sure I have reliabl= e communication in the event of an Internet emergency so that I can do what= I do best which is help other people and I thank you all for helping me wi= th this issue.


--000000000000ddb3d206133e07d2--