* [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program @ 2024-01-16 15:09 Dave Taht 2024-01-16 15:46 ` Bill Woodcock 2024-01-17 15:32 ` michael brooks - ESC 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2024-01-16 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! this is the kind of initiative I can get behind. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/internet-society-foundation_the-sustainable-peering-infrastructure-activity-7153019625645977601-dYUX -- 40 years of net history, a couple songs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program 2024-01-16 15:09 [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program Dave Taht @ 2024-01-16 15:46 ` Bill Woodcock 2024-01-16 16:18 ` Dave Taht 2024-01-17 15:32 ` michael brooks - ESC 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Bill Woodcock @ 2024-01-16 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! > On Jan 16, 2024, at 16:09, Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > this is the kind of initiative I can get behind. What, specifically, do you find admirable about it? -Bill ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program 2024-01-16 15:46 ` Bill Woodcock @ 2024-01-16 16:18 ` Dave Taht 2024-01-16 16:25 ` Bill Woodcock 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2024-01-16 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bill Woodcock Cc: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! You're tough, Bill! I do not know any more about this program than from the link, but it appeals to me at various levels. Notably: "Funds are available for training, community/regional development, and equipment purchases such as switches, optic modules, servers, and routers." Not enough people really understand BGP, nor the need for an internet to be an internet, and sometimes the capex needed to put in a better switch or router, just isn't there. So in particular, I would love to see efforts to make the need for IXPs more understandable. A couple weeks ago isoc also came out with a $12M program to support internet resilience. I have been watching several WISPs boast today how their networks stayed up (with adequate backup power and meshy links) when their fiber competitors didn't, in the current cold/snow snap... I have been looking also, into cheaper gear that can do this job, built around DANOS and SONIC. There's one switch for $1400 base cost that looked really good, built around that. Flaws: This is support for the traditional IXP model, which does not include middle mile/backhaul to another IXP hub. It does, however, have a carveout for IP transit to attract CDNs, but it's really not the same thing. Doesn't have a carve-out for software development. I think it really sad that so many seem to think that happens magically, and for free, nowadays. On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:46 AM Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 16, 2024, at 16:09, Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > this is the kind of initiative I can get behind. > > What, specifically, do you find admirable about it? > > -Bill > -- 40 years of net history, a couple songs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program 2024-01-16 16:18 ` Dave Taht @ 2024-01-16 16:25 ` Bill Woodcock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Bill Woodcock @ 2024-01-16 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht Cc: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! > On Jan 16, 2024, at 17:18, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not know any more about this program than from the link Well, paying PR firms to write web content is one way to spend $100M/year. > “Funds are available for training, community/regional development, and > equipment purchases such as switches, optic modules, servers, and > routers.” Having been doing this for thirty years, I can assure you that nobody who’s trying to build an IXP needs 0.005% of ISOC’s budget. They need information and experience. > I would love to see efforts to make the need for IXPs more understandable. Yep, definitely. But that’s not what’s being floated here. > This is support for the traditional IXP model, which does not include > middle mile/backhaul to another IXP hub. What would that accomplish? > It does, however, have a carveout for IP transit to attract CDNs Yep, Google will always take your money. Not sure what that would accomplish, though, other than to encourage Google to be more evil more of the time. Doesn’t have anything to do with IXPs. > Doesn't have a carve-out for software development. I think it really sad that so many seem to think that happens magically, and for free, nowadays. Yep. -Bill ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program 2024-01-16 15:09 [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program Dave Taht 2024-01-16 15:46 ` Bill Woodcock @ 2024-01-17 15:32 ` michael brooks - ESC 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: michael brooks - ESC @ 2024-01-17 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2568 bytes --] Caveat: pure ignorance in the process of being mitigated at work in the comments below. I can see this initiative helping a situation like ours. As a non-transit peer to our ISPs, we certainly do not qualify as an IXP in the traditional sense. But we do have a potential impact on our peers as well as a possible impact on the community at large, thus some education would be beneficial (education almost always is not *not* beneficial...). We do have an opportunity as an anchor institution to become a non-traditional IXP by fronting Internet service to downstream partners via a unique model used by our non-traditional ISP. So, my point is if any initiative strives to provide education, I am in support of it. Especially, it has my support if it helps to build out Internet access for both partner institutions looking to bolster their access, as well as potentially allowing for underprivileged community members to gain access via unique connectivity infrastructures. HaPpY NeW YeaR! michael brooks Sr. Network Engineer Adams 12 Five Star Schools michael.brooks@adams12.org :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: "flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss" On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 8:09 AM Dave Taht via Nnagain < nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > this is the kind of initiative I can get behind. > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.linkedin.com/posts/internet-society-foundation_the-sustainable-peering-infrastructure-activity-7153019625645977601-dYUX__;!!IR39LLzvxw!MFcZccyBF5_4C8vqmJSBT7-FQzLzBd_JQ1vqg2_19byFHrH4fNoOnt1-K1GOXGjf8pVMdFAY4t85nMUvfBzcplkuBMZchpq2$ > > > -- > 40 years of net history, a couple songs: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E__;!!IR39LLzvxw!MFcZccyBF5_4C8vqmJSBT7-FQzLzBd_JQ1vqg2_19byFHrH4fNoOnt1-K1GOXGjf8pVMdFAY4t85nMUvfBzcplkuBBHlQL8f$ > Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos > _______________________________________________ > Nnagain mailing list > Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain__;!!IR39LLzvxw!MFcZccyBF5_4C8vqmJSBT7-FQzLzBd_JQ1vqg2_19byFHrH4fNoOnt1-K1GOXGjf8pVMdFAY4t85nMUvfBzcplkuBJ1TE8kZ$ > -- This is a staff email account managed by Adams 12 Five Star Schools. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5592 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-17 15:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-01-16 15:09 [NNagain] ISOC's IXP program Dave Taht 2024-01-16 15:46 ` Bill Woodcock 2024-01-16 16:18 ` Dave Taht 2024-01-16 16:25 ` Bill Woodcock 2024-01-17 15:32 ` michael brooks - ESC
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox