Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
To: Dave Cohen <craetdave@gmail.com>
Cc: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Brent Legg" <blegg@connectednation.org>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 01:04:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1F1BC86-43EE-42D5-8440-A155660FE749@pch.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D15096AE-9621-4B99-85C8-D3F442682A8F@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]



> On Feb 23, 2024, at 01:03, Dave Cohen <craetdave@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this landscape is changing. These days I’m only focused on a couple of specific markets, but in those markets we are seeing both 1) a proliferation of IXs either adding nodes in new facilities or getting connectivity out to them to provide at least some capability and 2) datacenter providers, particularly more large-deployment-oriented facilities, seeking to attract IXPs in their sites or drive connectivity out to them as part of their own connectivity offerings.

How does any of that constitute a change?

                                -Bill


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-23  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 22:54 Brent Legg
2024-02-22  8:14 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 13:39 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-22 18:58   ` rjmcmahon
2024-02-22 23:31     ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23  0:03       ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23  0:04         ` Bill Woodcock [this message]
2024-02-23  0:09           ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23  0:51             ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23  1:47               ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-24 12:05     ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 12:27       ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 13:12         ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 13:24           ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 14:03             ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 21:30               ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 19:30       ` Robert McMahon
2024-02-25  6:04         ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 20:15   ` [NNagain] Email and The Internet? Jack Haverty
2024-02-23  0:02   ` [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project Bill Woodcock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1F1BC86-43EE-42D5-8440-A155660FE749@pch.net \
    --to=woody@pch.net \
    --cc=blegg@connectednation.org \
    --cc=craetdave@gmail.com \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox