From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:24:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E288D4D0-456F-4600-9B43-41BFA730DAD5@pch.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS9mxO5+xye0f-FBViKwk2nzfoZWijk=Caijht=aVy-DqTmvA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 568 bytes --]
> On Feb 24, 2024, at 14:12, Fearghas Mckay via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2024 at 12:27:09, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Who can fund more IXPs? The internet society has a 50k set-asied.
> The member ISPs perhaps ? Seems to work in a lot of other countries.
Exactly. It works fine in the US, as well, as we can see from ~130 IXPs, of which only the original four got subsidies.
Money is never the problem for startup IXPs. It’s always location and governance.
-Bill
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-24 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 22:54 Brent Legg
2024-02-22 8:14 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 13:39 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-22 18:58 ` rjmcmahon
2024-02-22 23:31 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23 0:03 ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23 0:04 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23 0:09 ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-23 0:51 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-23 1:47 ` Dave Cohen
2024-02-24 12:05 ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 12:27 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 13:12 ` Fearghas Mckay
2024-02-24 13:24 ` Bill Woodcock [this message]
2024-02-24 14:03 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-24 21:30 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-24 19:30 ` Robert McMahon
2024-02-25 6:04 ` Bill Woodcock
2024-02-22 20:15 ` [NNagain] Email and The Internet? Jack Haverty
2024-02-23 0:02 ` [NNagain] The Whys of the Wichita IXP Project Bill Woodcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E288D4D0-456F-4600-9B43-41BFA730DAD5@pch.net \
--to=woody@pch.net \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox