From: Richard Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Frantisek Borsik" <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
Cc: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
Subject: [NNagain] Re: Net Neutrality - a battle in Europe: Deutsche Telekom case shines light on 'two-speed' internet
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:16:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <IA0PR12MB775119FF6F70200E8A9D78068AC3A@IA0PR12MB7751.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHxHggfEOY-anirPCoxntsnY4mcCibdCFpirRT1WwSG4pmbiqg@mail.gmail.com>
Seems to me (NANE - not a networking expert 😊) that this is a very complex optimization problem comprised of quasi-static facilities (networks with given characteristics ... peak BW/speed between many nodes/routers/etc..) and a massive number of end nodes (aka customers) with requirements ranging from source-only (providers) to receive-only (consumers) and everything in between. Is it clear/obvious that all "end nodes" are created equal? Does the efficacy of "Everyone pays at whatever rate they can afford/wish and is available." Depend on this? Is NN assuming that they are? Inquiring minds ... 😊😊😊
Cheers,
RR
-----Original Message-----
From: Vint Cerf via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 3:20 AM
To: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
Subject: [NNagain] Re: Net Neutrality - a battle in Europe: Deutsche Telekom case shines light on 'two-speed' internet
definitely against neutrality as I understand it. Netflix can pay for big pipes to deliver content to users who pay for whatever rate they want to access that content. This is an attempt to create a two sided market when it is should be one-sided. Everyone pays at whatever rate they can afford/wish and is available.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 6:12 AM Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com<mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> Looks to me, Vint, that this is different. It's not me as a customer
> paying for a wider, faster pipe in the last-mile.
>
> DT is asking content providers, like Netflix, to pay for their content
> to be delivered in the "fast" lane.
>
> All the best,
>
> Frank
>
> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>
>
> *In loving memory of Dave Täht: *1965-2025
>
> https://libreqos.io/2025/04/01/in-loving-memory-of-dave/
>
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>
> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 <+421%20919%20416%20714>
>
> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 <+420%20775%20230%20885>
>
> Skype: casioa5302ca
>
> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com<mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 12:00 PM Vint Cerf via Nnagain <
> nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote:
>
>> Frantisek,
>> how is a "fast lane" different from paying more for higher bandwidth?
>> The latter is pretty common and even understandable. In the US,
>> neutrality meant everyone has the same access rules which includes
>> being able to pay more for higher speed. The users got to determine
>> what speed they wanted, not the provider. Nor could the provider
>> (ISP) choose arbitrarily which services the user would get at what
>> speed. The application providers, similarly, get to choose what speed
>> and cost they can provide service. In all cases, the ISP does not get
>> to dictate the speeds they offer to users and application providers.
>> The rule works more or less like common carriage. You pay for what
>> you get, the carrier has to offer all services to all parties on the same terms.
>>
>> v
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 5:13 AM Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <
>> nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote:
>>
>> > DT is at it again:
>> >
>> > https://euobserver.com/digital/ar5da666d9
>> >
>> > "Earlier this year, Austrian and German NGOs filed a complaint with
>> > the German Federal Network Agency against Deutsche Telekom,
>> > alleging that
>> the
>> > internet service provider (ISP) is creating paid fast lanes to
>> > access websites.
>> >
>> > On Wednesday (5 November), the groups held a talk to outline their
>> > complaint and why it's important for Europe's net neutrality.
>> >
>> > The NGOs consists of Epicenter.works, the Society for Civil Rights,
>> > the Federation of German Consumer Organisations, plus Stanford
>> > professor Barbara van Schewick, arguing that Deutsche Telekom is
>> > creating a two-tiered internet through having web hosts pay extra
>> > for Telekom’s users."
>> >
>> > All the best,
>> >
>> > Frank
>> >
>> > Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>> >
>> >
>> > *In loving memory of Dave Täht: *1965-2025
>> >
>> > https://libreqos.io/2025/04/01/in-loving-memory-of-dave/
>> >
>> >
>> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>> >
>> > Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 <+421%20919%20416%20714>
>> <+421%20919%20416%20714>
>> >
>> > iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 <+420%20775%20230%20885>
>> <+420%20775%20230%20885>
>> >
>> > Skype: casioa5302ca
>> >
>> > frantisek.borsik@gmail.com<mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nnagain mailing list -- nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> To
>> > unsubscribe send an email to nnagain-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
>> Vint Cerf
>> Google, LLC
>> 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor
>> Reston, VA 20190
>> +1 (571) 213 1346 <(571)%20213-1346>
>>
>>
>> until further notice
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nnagain mailing list -- nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> To unsubscribe
>> send an email to nnagain-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>
>
--
Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
Vint Cerf
Google, LLC
1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor
Reston, VA 20190
+1 (571) 213 1346
until further notice
_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list -- nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
To unsubscribe send an email to nnagain-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 10:16 [NNagain] " Frantisek Borsik
2025-11-07 11:00 ` [NNagain] " Vint Cerf
2025-11-07 11:15 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-11-07 11:20 ` Vint Cerf
2025-11-07 18:16 ` Richard Roy [this message]
2025-11-07 13:41 ` Livingood, Jason
2025-11-07 11:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-11-07 11:47 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-11-07 11:58 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-11-07 13:52 ` Livingood, Jason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=IA0PR12MB775119FF6F70200E8A9D78068AC3A@IA0PR12MB7751.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=vint@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox