Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] FCC - delete, delete, delete
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <IA0PR12MB7751F7EF224FEB158C74A0DE8AD32@IA0PR12MB7751.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6z7H5SPRt5VK0zoLFWf2WDeBsLTvpWWwWcL7O_KLukwQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2910 bytes --]

This administration is a total reflection of Musk's crash and burn philosophy evidenced by his cavalier approach to space flight.  This can be tolerated when lives and prosperity of millions of citizens are not at stake, however it's a disaster when they are.  Thinking the entire government can be run like Musk runs SpaceX is a recipe for "every man and woman for themselves" appearing at a theater near you very soon.  If you thought the "wild west of the 1880's" was interesting, just wait.  Instead of Winchesters, we have AK47's everywhere and enough ammunition to take out the entire population ... 10 times over.  Did you order yours yet?? 😊😊😊



As for "what the FCC can do", "dissolve itself" comes to mind. AFAIK, it's been over a decade since they have done anything helpful or useful for any American citizen who isn't the head of a major corporation. If you delete the entire organization, there will be no one around to enforce whatever regs are still on the books so who cares? ... and you'll save another few 10's of millions of dollars annually which will fit nicely in the pockets of the "good folks", aka FODT. 😊😊😊



RR



-----Original Message-----
From: Nnagain <nnagain-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> On Behalf Of Dave Taht via Nnagain
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:39 AM
To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: [NNagain] FCC - delete, delete, delete



See: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-219A1.pdf



... the Commission has opened a new docket, titled “In re: Delete, Delete, Delete,” in which the agency seeks comment “on every rule, regulation, or guidance document that the FCC should eliminate for the purposes of alleviating unnecessary regulatory burdens.”



I don't have a big list (today!) of what I've found unnecessarily restrictive. I find many of the rules around ham radio and the internet pretty overly restrictive, and thought that the outdoor licensing system for wifi6 pretty painful (but that seems to be mostly resolved). Most of the stuff I care about seems to require more regulation not less (router security, deploying AQM and FQ technology). I wish it didn't.



My impression is that the FCC is not going to regain any authority over the internet more than they have and title II is dead. They might get spectrum authority back (which would be a good thing IMHO).



What oxes will get put up to be gored?



What programs need to be preserved?





--

Dave Täht CSO, LibreQoS

"A perfect storm" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQX1PmRULU0

_______________________________________________

Nnagain mailing list

Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>

https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6191 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-13  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-12 17:39 Dave Taht
2025-03-13  0:00 ` Richard Roy [this message]
2025-03-13 16:33   ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-13 17:00     ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-03-13 18:36       ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-13 23:59         ` David Lang
2025-03-14  1:12           ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14  1:38         ` David Bray, PhD
2025-03-14  2:17           ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14  2:20             ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14  2:24             ` David Bray, PhD
2025-03-14  8:16               ` Tara Stella
2025-03-14 18:53                 ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-14 19:05                   ` Richard Roy
2025-03-14 21:09                     ` David Lang
2025-03-14 21:20                       ` Dick Roy
2025-03-14 21:48                         ` David Lang
2025-03-15 18:16                           ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-15 18:49                             ` Daniel Ezell
2025-03-16 17:50                               ` Robert McMahon
2025-03-15 18:50                             ` Robert McMahon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=IA0PR12MB7751F7EF224FEB158C74A0DE8AD32@IA0PR12MB7751.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox