Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this time!
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
	heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [NNagain] Re: can I change the subject?
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:57:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB71046508C3B555ECA4C99BC2C7C3A@MW4PR11MB7104.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJUtOOjNWf_AKMOn95_vOX0vy+LwpF80Vng_e8q5rcRLetUVGQ@mail.gmail.com>

> conversation with the installers.  Because of that I forgot to turn off the
> wifi on the box they'd delivered.
> The next day I configured a pair of ubnt devices to create a link.  Out of
> habit, I did a speedtest.  Got less than 10 mbps instead of the usual 300
> mbps.

It is quite common for ISPs to do this, especially when they also operate a 5G network, as they broadcast a hidden SSID that a mobile phone will use instead of 5G - carries offload onto WiFi about 80-90% of mobile data. For example, you may but service from “ISP X” and you buy wireline service and 5G mobile service and (via handset carrier settings) you handset will see the hidden SSID and connect to that rather than the 5G network.

That said, getting 10 Mbps vs 300 Mbps sounds like you are not correctly provisioned in the network or having some other significant impairment - and you should contact your ISP to fix it.

> I turned off the wifi and my new link immediately showed the usual 300
> mbps.

Sounds like some sort of misconfiguration or significant performance bug in the gateway software. As noted above you should contact the ISP.

> My theory is that they are using the wifi to constantly spy on the
> customer.  I'm figuring that they're using these microwave devices as
> optical cameras which can see through walls.

Doubtful. You may want to be more concerned about the tracking that occurs at the application layer and via mobile handset apps.

JL

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 11:51 [NNagain] " le berger des photons
2025-11-07 12:05 ` [NNagain] " Frantisek Borsik
2025-11-07 13:57   ` Livingood, Jason [this message]
2025-11-07 20:54     ` le berger des photons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW4PR11MB71046508C3B555ECA4C99BC2C7C3A@MW4PR11MB7104.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jason_livingood@comcast.com \
    --cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox