From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
Received: from bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3268D3B29D;
 Sat, 11 Nov 2023 13:24:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123])
 by bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 531981B289;
 Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:24:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bobcat.rjmcmahon.com 531981B289
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rjmcmahon.com;
 s=bobcat; t=1699727095;
 bh=hQ42ViTTSfg9c2u5TWRQtHvXTwyxstjbhKR4KobYmkw=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=TXmmD8ANEhZkfH/BoBxRB+HTVVU148hQf/HVyRorB8PsYDIZaexQGK2kRu/TZzq4Z
 u3xFCLk2bAjlY0+nqCoM1DXRwodticg1vFKMSQEnByJazzAsl9aa9snWy+L2aedFud
 xsk/gySOrCtJzKQ/zCsfPDiZKf9a+zfymL6TxbII=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:24:55 -0800
From: rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_a?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?spects_heard_this_time!?= <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4ZGrguPqGR=XukT2ra0XC=7y-7qnx+Bbc2JF1OmqX_bw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw4ZGrguPqGR=XukT2ra0XC=7y-7qnx+Bbc2JF1OmqX_bw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f07465ad9cdc14f0a6681b713dd0b82d@rjmcmahon.com>
X-Sender: rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [NNagain] FCC NOI due dec 1 on broadband speed standards
X-BeenThere: nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Network_Neutrality_is_back!_Let=C2=B4s_make_the_technical_aspects_heard_this_time!?=
 <nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/nnagain>,
 <mailto:nnagain-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/nnagain>
List-Post: <mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nnagain-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain>,
 <mailto:nnagain-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 18:24:56 -0000

Thanks for this. It helps a lot.

I think a unified voice from this group around the metrics could be 
quite good. I do want to make sure iperf 2 covers this in a simple 
manner and very well so we in the chip business can catch issues very 
early in the process life cycle:

Regardless of the benchmark that we select for fixed broadband service, 
we believe it is
valuable for fixed providers to report on a wide range of download 
speeds and, in addition, multiple
upload speeds for each download speed. We invite commenters to suggest 
what they consider relevant
combinations of benchmark download and upload speeds that we should 
report for both fixed and mobile
broadband service. As part of their suggestions, we request that 
commenters consider the availability of
reliable and comprehensive data and suggest available sources.

Bob

> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-89A1.pdf
> 
> Obviously I am going to have to weigh in on section 26, at least. I
> would rather be writing code...