From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [NNagain] On "Throttling" behaviors
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:39:50 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <no6r0rr6-5570-8o94-r1s7-3504622rso33@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9E96A830-CE03-44FC-925B-77896FD6976E@gmx.de>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:54, rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com> wrote:
>>
>> Natural monopolies are things with high sunk costs. Things with high sunk costs don't necessarily exist (like electrified roads) even though they add huge value to society and can help curb climate impacts. A natural monopoly exists unrelated to a provider already having an infrastructure in place per that monopoly.
>>
>> Fiber with up gradable optics to hundreds of millions of buildings that can leverage the NRE from data centers are natural monopolies and don't really exist in most places, even though they are critical to mitigating climate impact.
>>
>> The idea of municipal ownership of access networks in the U.S. was pushed in 2000 after the 1996 Telco act. It didn't work out.
>
> [SM] I only monitored this cursory (not living in the US any longer),
> but I seem to recall quite a number of questionable plays against municipal
> ownership by the existing ISPs; I would book this as "never really tried", and
> not as we gave it an honest try but it fell short. That said many
> municipalities (in many parts of the world) are hardly in the shape required
> to built new costly infrastructure as they are having troubles maintaining the
> infrastructure on their hands with the available funds.
I would say that it failed in many high-profile locations, succeded in a few
others, and isn't a dead idea.
My city (LA suburb of >125k) is in the process of rolling out fiber everywhere.
They are well behind, so probably a 3-4 year process rather than a 2-3 year
process (now saying spring of next year for my location), so I can't say how
well it will end up working. But they are avoiding the 'space on the poles'
fight by having them trench up every street (~4" wide trench)
In some other states, the ISPs were able to get state laws passed to prohibit
community owned networks (on the claim that they were anti-competitive)
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-01 17:15 [NNagain] Some backstory on the nn-again mailing list Dave Taht
2023-10-01 18:56 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-10-01 19:51 ` [NNagain] On "Throttling" behaviors Dave Taht
2023-10-01 20:50 ` Dave Cohen
2023-10-01 22:01 ` Patrick Maupin
2023-10-02 1:34 ` dan
2023-10-02 7:28 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 16:29 ` dan
2023-10-04 7:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 15:30 ` Andy Ringsmuth
2023-10-02 18:28 ` Nathan Loofbourrow
2023-10-02 20:34 ` Colin_Higbie
2023-10-02 21:04 ` Dave Cohen
2023-10-02 21:07 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-02 21:43 ` Colin_Higbie
2023-10-02 21:55 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-03 19:29 ` Colin_Higbie
2023-10-03 19:45 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-04 0:57 ` David Lang
2023-10-03 7:50 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-03 8:10 ` Karl Auerbach
2023-10-03 14:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-03 15:34 ` dan
2023-10-03 16:54 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-03 17:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-03 18:09 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-10-03 18:14 ` dan
2023-10-03 19:44 ` Dick Roy
2023-10-03 18:10 ` dan
2023-10-03 19:23 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-04 1:05 ` David Lang
2023-10-04 0:39 ` David Lang [this message]
2023-10-03 20:26 ` Colin_Higbie
2023-10-03 21:40 ` dan
2023-10-04 15:56 ` Colin_Higbie
2023-10-04 17:45 ` David Lang
2023-10-05 20:24 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-10-05 22:17 ` Dick Roy
2023-10-05 22:47 ` Jeremy Austin
2023-10-05 22:53 ` Dave Cohen
2023-10-06 15:56 ` Dick Roy
2023-10-06 15:58 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-04 17:59 ` rjmcmahon
2023-10-04 19:26 ` Dick Roy
[not found] ` <MN2PR16MB3391A66B0DC222C43664DAD6F1CBA@MN2PR16MB3391.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
2023-10-05 8:44 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-05 19:07 ` David Lang
2023-10-03 23:17 ` Mark Steckel
2023-10-04 7:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 6:48 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 13:43 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-10-02 14:51 ` Mark Steckel
2023-10-02 18:09 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-10-02 18:15 ` Patrick Maupin
2023-10-02 19:18 ` Dick Roy
2023-10-02 6:34 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 13:27 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-10-02 6:06 ` [NNagain] Some backstory on the nn-again mailing list Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 12:36 ` Bless, Roland (TM)
2023-10-03 7:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-02 20:18 [NNagain] On "Throttling" behaviors Livingood, Jason
2023-10-02 20:28 ` Dick Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/nnagain.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=no6r0rr6-5570-8o94-r1s7-3504622rso33@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox