[Bismark-devel] bismark-active

[Srikanth Sundaresan]

I think eventually we will go with that. The only thing I don't like
about that is it's hard to remember whose is which. :)


On 04/26/2011 05:18 PM, Poole, Brian wrote:
> We can add auto-device naming if we decide on the convention to use. I had the MAC address (based on eth0) one mocked up before. Shall we just go with that? <whatever-the-prefix-was><full-mac-address-minus-the-colons> ?
> 
> Brian
> ________________________________________
> From: bismark-devel-bounces at lists.bufferbloat.net [bismark-devel-bounces at lists.bufferbloat.net] on behalf of Srikanth Sundaresan [srikanth at gatech.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:16 PM
> To: bismark-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: [Bismark-devel] bismark-active
> 
> bismark-mgmt seems to work. It needs some more testing, and there's also
> a manual component (naming the device), but it seems to be in good shape.
> 
> To start testing bismark-active, we need the following scripts:
> 
> bismark-measure-active
> bismark-tr
> bismark-rtr
> bismark-ping
> bismark-netperf
> bismark-netperf-thread
> bismark-dns
> bismark-ditg
> bismark-sp
> 
> The binaries:
> shaperprobe
> ITGRecv
> ITGSend
> ITGDec
> 
> packages:
> gnu-time
> bind-host
> curl(preferable, but not necessary)
> 
> - Srikanth
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-devel mailing list
> Bismark-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel