[Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license?

[Nick Feamster]

Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo.

Not sure what we could call that one.  bismark-router?  

-Nick

On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:

> I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more appropriate.
> What do you think?
> 
> I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing it.
> Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?
> 
> Walter
> 
> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is publicly available.
> 
> "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent analysis."
> 
> 1. What license are we going to use?
> 
> 2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (2) BISMark?
> 
> For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the repositories are currently public?
> 
> How should we handle this issue?
> 
> -Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Bismark-devel mailing list
> Bismark-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> Email: walter.dedonato at unina.it
> WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
>