[Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license?

[Nick Feamster]

Cool.  The report is "done" except for polishing, and some source code pointers, which I will also add to projectbismark.net once they are ready.  I'll send a draft out to HNDR now for comments.

-Nick

On May 31, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:

> I think so... 
> I'm currently setting up everything to start importing the Bismark repository.
> 
> 
> 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> Do you have access to the "bismark-devel" user on github?
> 
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> 
> > Sold! :-)
> >
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> > Yes.  "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good.
> >
> > On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> >
> > > Why don't bismark-firmwares?
> > >
> > > Walter
> > >
> > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> > > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo.
> > >
> > > Not sure what we could call that one.  bismark-router?
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > >
> > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> > >
> > > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more appropriate.
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing it.
> > > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Walter
> > > >
> > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> > > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is publicly available.
> > > >
> > > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source) and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent analysis."
> > > >
> > > > 1. What license are we going to use?
> > > >
> > > > 2. Should we move to github.com today?  I am happy to try to migrate the network dashboard code into there.  What about: (1) the BISMark firmware build; (2) BISMark?
> > > >
> > > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if the repositories are currently public?
> > > >
> > > > How should we handle this issue?
> > > >
> > > > -Nick
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > > > Bismark-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > > > Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> > > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> > > > Email: walter.dedonato at unina.it
> > > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> Università  degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> Email: walter.dedonato at unina.it
> WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
>