what I think is wrong with eBDP in debloat-testing

[John W. Linville]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:10:57PM +0100, Dave Taht wrote:

> John was right when he wrote in the initial announcement:
> 
> "This version runs separate instances of the algorithm for each WMM
> queue -- I reckon that makes sense. "
> 
> and it doesn't.
> 
> "I still ignore HT aggregation, as I'm pretty sure I don't understand
> how it really effects the issue."
> 
> Messes it up completely.

So, can I drop that patch from debloat-testing now?  :-)

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville at tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.