[Bloat] Network computing article on bloat
Dave Hart
davehart at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 14:13:14 EDT 2011
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 17:05 UTC, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not bad, although I can live without the title. Coins a new-ish phrase
> "insertion latency"
>
> http://www.networkcomputing.com/end-to-end-apm/bufferbloat-and-the-collapse-of-the-internet.php
The piece ends with a paragraph claiming preventing packet loss is
addressing a more fundamental problem which contributes to
bufferbloat. As long as the writer and readers believe packet loss is
an unmitigated evil, the battle is lost. More encouraging would have
been a statement that packet loss is preferable to excessive queueing
and a required TCP feedback signal when ECN isn't in play.
Cheers,
Dave Hart
More information about the Bloat
mailing list