[Bloat] Measuring latency-under-load consistently
Jonathan Morton
chromatix99 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 12 18:58:09 EST 2011
On 13 Mar, 2011, at 12:23 am, richard wrote:
>> However, large TCP windows do consume RAM in both server and client,
>> and with a sufficient number of simultaneous clients, that could
>> theoretically cause trouble. Constraining TCP windows to near the
>> actual BDP is more efficient all around.
>
> Yes - have had RAM exhaustion problems on busy servers with large video
> files - major headache.
Sounds like a good reason to switch to Vegas or at least Illinois on those servers. Those are much less aggressive at growing the congestion window than the default CUBIC.
- Jonathan
More information about the Bloat
mailing list