[Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCPflavours - timestamps?
Dave Täht
d at taht.net
Sun Mar 20 18:50:00 EDT 2011
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> writes:
> On 21 Mar, 2011, at 12:18 am, david at lang.hm wrote:
>
>>> 0) Buffering more than 1 second of data is always unacceptable.
Well, in the case of the DTN, it's required.
We're not testing interplanetary networks here, (rather, an artificially
induced one extending out well beyond the moon!) but it bears a little
thinking about.
--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net
More information about the Bloat
mailing list