[Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers (was: RE: Burst Loss)

[Dave Taht]

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:49 AM, <BeckW at telekom.de> wrote:

> (I think) Fred wrote:
> > Well, the extra delay is solvable in the transport. The question isn't
> really what the impact on the > network is; it's what the requirements of
> the application are. For voice, if a voice sample is
> > delayed 50 ms the jitter buffer in the codec resolves that - microseconds
> are irrelevant.
>
> If you meant 50 microseconds, ignore the rest of this post.
>
> 50 milliseconds is a *long* time in VoIP. The total mouth-to-ear delay
> budget is only 150 ms. Adaptive jitter buffer algorithms choose a buffer
> size that is bigger than the observed delay variation. So the additional
> delay will be even higher than 50 ms.
>
>
*10* ms in terms of jitter is a *long* time in voip.

-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20110517/81081167/attachment-0003.html>