[Bloat] mosh, ecn, and diffserv marking

[Eric Dumazet]

On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:22 +0200, Michael Welzl wrote:

> One ECN-specific concern that was addressed is that it's often in the 
> interest of the receiver, but not the sender, to lie about ECN and 
> simply cheat (reflect "nonono, no congestion at all" back to the 
> sender). This is addressed by RFC3540, which is experimental and not 
> really used.

Yes, apparently :(