[Bloat] The challenge

[Roger Jørgensen]

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Simon Barber <simon at superduper.net> wrote:
> One question now remains - will codel AQM be sufficient on it's own in
> getting delays down to levels that users are happy with for the common
> latency sensitive interactive traffic - VoIP, gaming and Skype for example -
> or are the further reductions that can be had with traffic classification
> and smart queuing algorithms necessary? The nicest part about codel on it's
> own is that it works on opaque packets - it will handle VPNs and traffic
> within them nicely. It gets away from all the complexity required to
> classify traffic in a world where traffic is often trying to hide.

I'm more worried about how long cascades of codel code in equipment
will work together, add lots of traffic to the mix, just how will it
behave then?



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no