[Bloat] [e2e] bufferbloat paper
Michael Richardson
mcr at sandelman.ca
Thu Jan 10 08:46:17 EST 2013
Thanks for the reply, comments below.
>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Winstein <keithw at mit.edu> writes:
>> Have you considered repeating your test with two phones?
Keith> Yes, we have tried up to four phones at the same time.
>> Can the download on phone1 affect the latency seen by a second phone?
Keith> In our experience, a download on phone1 will not affect the unloaded
Keith> latency seen by phone2. The cell towers appear to use a per-UE
Keith> (per-phone) queue on uplink and downlink. (This is similar to what a
Keith> commodity cable modem user sees -- I don't get long delays just
Keith> because my neighbor is saturating his uplink or downlink and
Keith> causing a
Keith> standing queue for himself.)
This is good news of a sort.
It means that there is no shared xmit queue on the tower, and that the
4G/LTE/whatever-they-call-it-today business of moving voice to VoIP is
going to do okay.
The question then becomes: how to get all of one's low-latency traffic
onto that second channel!
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
More information about the Bloat
mailing list