[Bloat] Remy: Computer-Generated Congestion Control

[Jonathan Morton]

I don't suppose anyone has set up a lab containing several hundred wireless
clients and a number of APs? A stepping stone towards that would be a
railway carriage simulator, with one AP, a simulated 3G uplink, and a
couple of dozen clients.

I wonder how well simply putting fq on each of the clients and fq_codel on
the APs would work. My general impression is that fq is the right default
choice for end hosts (which are generally not at the bottleneck) and
fq_codel is the right default choice for bottleneck routers. A typical
consumer router/AP might see the bottleneck for both directions, though not
necessarily at the same time.

- Jonathan Morton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20140821/ba972ad8/attachment-0002.html>